De novo and inherited dominant variants in U4 and U6 snRNAs cause retinitis pigmentosa
Quinodoz, M.; Rodenburg, K.; Cvackova, Z.; Kaminska, K.; de Bruijn, S. E.; Iglesias-Romero, A. B.; Boonen, E. G. M.; Ullah, M.; Zomer, N.; Folcher, M.; Bijon, J.; Holtes, L. K.; Tsang, S. H.; Corradi, Z.; Freund, K. B.; Shliaga, S.; Panneman, D. M.; Hitti-Malin, R. J.; Ali, M.; AlTalbishi, A. a.; Andreasson, S.; Ansari, G.; Arno, G.; Astuti, G. D. N.; Ayuso, C.; Ayyagari, R.; Banfi, S.; Banin, E.; Barboni, M. T. S.; Bauwens, M.; Ben-Yosef, T.; Birch, D. G.; Biswas, P.; Blanco-Kelly, F.; Bocquet, B.; Boon, C. J. F.; Branham, K.; Britten-Jones, A. C.; Bujakowska, K. M.; Cadena, E. L.; Calzetti,
Show abstract
The U4 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) forms a duplex with the U6 snRNA and, together with U5 and [~]30 proteins, is part of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP complex, located at the core of the major spliceosome. Recently, recurrent de novo variants in the U4 RNA, transcribed from the RNU4-2 gene, and in at least two other RNU genes were discovered to cause neurodevelopmental disorder. We detected inherited and de novo heterozygous variants in RNU4-2 (n.18_19insA and n.56T>C) and in four out of the five RNU6 paralogues (n.55_56insG and n.56_57insG) in 135 individuals from 62 families with non-syndromic retinitis pigmentosa (RP), a rare form of hereditary blindness. We show that these variants are recurrent among RP families and invariably cluster in close proximity within the three-way junction (between stem-I, the 5 stem-loop and stem-II) of the U4/U6 duplex, affecting its natural conformation. Interestingly, this region binds to numerous splicing factors of the tri-snRNP complex including PRPF3, PRPF8 and PRPF31, previously associated with RP as well. The U4 and U6 variants identified seem to affect snRNP biogenesis, namely the U4/U6 di-snRNP, which is an assembly intermediate of the tri-snRNP. Based on the number of positive cases observed, deleterious variants in RNU4-2 and in RNU6 paralogues could be a significant cause of isolated or dominant RP, accounting for up to 1.2% of all undiagnosed RP cases. This study highlights the role of non-coding genes in rare Mendelian disorders and uncovers pleiotropy in RNU4-2, where different variants underlie neurodevelopmental disorder and RP.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dominant variants in major spliceosome U4 and U5 small nuclear RNA genes cause neurodevelopmental disorders through splicing disruption 97%
- Biallelic variants in RNU2-2 cause the most prevalent known recessive neurodevelopmental disorder 94%
- Systematic analysis of snRNA genes reveals frequent RNU2-2 variants in dominant and recessive developmental and epileptic encephalopathies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole genome sequencing delineates regulatory and novel genic variants in childhood cardiomyopathy 93%
- Discordance between a deep learning model and clinical-grade variant pathogenicity classification in a rare disease cohort 92%
- Comprehensive reanalysis for CNVs in ES data from unsolved rare disease cases results in new diagnoses 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptome-wide outlier approach identifies individuals with minor spliceopathies 96%
- High-throughput splicing assays identify missense and silent splice-disruptive POU1F1 variants underlying pituitary hormone deficiency 95%
- Non-coding variants upstream of MEF2C cause severe developmental disorder through three distinct loss-of-function mechanisms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- PRPF8-associated retinitis pigmentosa variant induces human neural retina-autonomous photoreceptor defects 93%
- Massively parallel identification of functionally consequential noncoding genetic variants in undiagnosed rare disease patients 93%
- Gene co-expression network analysis in human spinal cord highlights mechanisms underlying amyotrophic lateral sclerosis susceptibility 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.