Back

From dimer to tetramer: the evolutionary trajectory of C4 photosynthetic-NADP-ME oligomeric state in Poaceae

Boehm, J. M.; Willms, S.; Ferrao, O.; Buitrago-Arango, M.; Huedig, M.; Poschmann, G.; Fazelnia, N.; Nagel-Steger, L.; Klinke, S.; Drakonaki, A.; Gatsogiannis, C.; Tronconi, M. A.; Alvarez, C. E.; Maurino, V. G.

2025-01-06 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.01.05.631420 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The C4 carbon concentrating mechanism relies on specialized enzymes that have evolved unique expression patterns and biochemical properties distinct to their ancestral housekeeping forms. In maize and sorghum, the evolution of C4-NADP-malic enzyme (C4-NADP-ME) involved gene duplication and neofunctionalization, leading to the emergence of two plastidic isoforms: C4-NADP-ME and nonC4-NADP-ME, each with distinct kinetic and structural features. While C4-NADP-ME functions primarily as a tetramer, nonC4-NADP-ME exists in an equilibrium between dimeric and tetrameric forms, favoring the dimer in solution. This study shows which evolutionary changes in amino acid sequences influence the structure and function of these isoforms. By integrating X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, computational molecular modeling and targeted biochemical analysis of mutant and truncated protein variants, we identify crucial roles for the N- and C-terminal regions and specific amino acid residues in governing isoform oligomerization. Our results reveal that the N-terminal region is essential for stabilizing the dimeric form of nonC4-NADP-ME, whereas specific adaptive substitutions and interactions with the C-terminal region enhance the stability of the tetrameric state characteristic of the C4-adapted isoform. We propose that differences in the N-terminal domain between the C4 and nonC4 isoforms reflect distinct selective pressures, which have driven their evolutionary divergence to fulfill specialized cellular functions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.