Visual field specializations in mouse dLGN
Cha, K.; Rangel Olguin, A. G.; Sharif, R.; Cook, E. P.; Krishnaswamy, A.
Show abstract
Neural circuits throughout the visual system process features differently depending on where they appear in the visual field. While such location-specific processing exists in retina and in superior colliculus, the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) is thought to lack this specialization. Here, we show systematic visual field biases in dLGNs representation of spatial frequency, orientation, direction, and temporal frequency. Using axon-localized calcium indicators and widefield imaging, we discovered that dLGN boutons show systematic gradients in feature selectivity across the visual cortex (V1), while its retinal inputs lack such gradients for these features. Selective disruption of V1 feedback to dLGN perturbed gradient structure and magnitude. These results suggest that dLGN circuits transform uniformly distributed retinal feature inputs into spatially-biased representations along with cortical feedback. dLGN feature biases would allow a functional stream to detect ethologically salient visual inputs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Binocular integration of retinal motion information underlies optic flow processing by the cortex 98%
- Dendritic Architecture Enables de Novo Computation of Salient Motion in the Superior Colliculus 98%
- Neuronal birthdate reveals topography in a vestibular brainstem circuit for gaze stabilization 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Astrocytic modulation of population encoding in mouse visual cortex via GABA transporter 3 revealed by multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing 97%
- Rule-based modulation of a sensorimotor transformation across cortical areas 97%
- Layer 6 ensembles can selectively regulate the behavioral impact and layer-specific representation of sensory deviants 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.