Back

DNA supercoiling modulates eukaryotic transcription in a gene-orientation dependent manner

Morao, A. K.; Chervova, A.; Zhao, Y.; Ercan, S.; Cecere, G.

2025-01-03 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.01.03.631213 bioRxiv
Show abstract

DNA supercoiling is an intrinsic consequence of transcription that must be resolved to maintain proper gene expression. How DNA supercoiling shapes transcription dynamics in chromatinized animal genomes remains unclear. Here, we acutely depleted topoisomerases I and II in Caenorhabditis elegans and applied nascent transcription profiling, nuclear and total RNA-seq, histone modification mapping, and long-read sequencing to capture the immediate transcriptional and chromatin responses to topological stress. We show that the genomic context influences the effect of supercoiling on transcription initiation, elongation and coordinated expression of adjacent genes. The impact of supercoiling on transcription initiation is not uniformly repressive but instead depends on the orientation and proximity of neighboring genes. We find that negative supercoiling promotes coordinated expression of divergent gene pairs, while positive supercoiling inhibits and uncouples expression of convergent genes. DNA supercoiling hinders transcription elongation globally resulting in reduced production of longer transcripts and overall shortening of poly(A) tails. While DNA supercoiling generated by neighboring transcription impacts initiation, elongation defects are driven by local supercoiling generated by the genes own transcription. These elongation effects are not accompanied by global changes in elongation-associated histone modifications but coincide with modest reductions in promoter and enhancer marks. Our findings reveal a directional mechanism by which genome architecture shapes transcriptional responses to DNA supercoiling, uncovering a DNA topological basis for coordinated gene expression in a multicellular organism.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.