Selective attention network in naturalistic auditory scenes is object and scene specific
Wikman, P.; Muukkonen, I.; Kauramaki, J.; Laaksonen, V.; Waris, O.; Petkov, C.; Rauschecker, J.
Show abstract
Everyday auditory scenes often contain overlapping sound objects, requiring selective attention to isolate relevant objects from irrelevant background objects. This study examined how selective attention shapes neural representations of naturalistic sound scenes in the auditory cortex (AC). Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we recorded brain activity from participants (n = 20) as they attended to a designated object in scenes comprising three overlapping sounds. Scenes were constructed in two manners: one where each object belonged to a different category (speech, animal, instrument) and another where all objects were from the same category. Attending to speech consistently enhanced activations in lateral AC subfields, while attention to animal and instrument sounds preferentially modulated medial subfields, supporting models where attention modulates feature-selective neural gain in AC. Remarkably, however, spatial pattern analysis revealed that the attended object dominated the AC activation patterns of the entire scene in a manner depending on both object type and scene composition: When the objects of the scene belonged to different categories, attended objects dominated fields processing higher-level category-specific features. In contrast, when all scene objects shared the same category, dominance shifted to fields processing low-level acoustic features. Thus, attention seems to dynamically prioritize the features offering maximal contrast within a given context, emphasizing object-specific patterns in feature-similar scenes and category-level patterns in feature-diverse scenes. Our results support models where top-down signals not only modulate gain but also affect several steps of auditory scene decomposition and analysis - influencing stream segregation and gating of higher-level processing in a contextual manner, adapting to specific auditory environments.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metamodal Coupling of Vibrotactile and Auditory Speech Processing Systems Through Matched Stimulus Representations 97%
- Differential auditory and visual phase-locking are observed during audio-visual benefit and silent lip-reading for speech perception 97%
- Discovery, Interruption, and Updating of Auditory Regularities in Memory: Evidence from Low-Frequency Brain Dynamics in Human MEG 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Speech sound categorization: The contribution of non-auditory and auditory cortical regions 97%
- Language beyond the language system: dorsal visuospatial pathways support processing of demonstratives and spatial language during naturalistic fast fMRI 97%
- Cross-modal interactions at the audiovisual cocktail-party revealed by behavior, ERPs, and neural oscillations 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Preserved sensory processing but hampered conflict detection when stimulus input is task-irrelevant 97%
- Categorical representation from sound and sight in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex of sighted and blind 96%
- Resolving multisensory and attentional influences across cortical depth in sensory cortices 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.