Back

DANCE: An open-source analysis pipeline and low-cost hardware to quantify aggression and courtship in Drosophila

Yadav, R. S. P.; Dey, P.; Ansari, F.; Kottat, T.; Prabhu, P. P.; Vasam, M.; Ayyangar, S.; Bhaskar S, S.; Prabhu, K.; Ghosh, M.; Agrawal, P.

2025-01-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.03.631168 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantifying animal behavior is pivotal for identifying the underlying neuronal and genetic mechanisms involved. Computational approaches have enabled automated analysis of complex behaviors such as aggression and courtship in Drosophila. However, existing approaches rely on rigid, rule-based algorithms and expensive hardware, limiting sensitivity to behavioral variations and accessibility. Here, we describe the Drosophila Aggression and Courtship Evaluator (DANCE), a low-cost, open-source platform that combines machine learning-based classifiers and inexpensive hardware to quantify aggression and courtship. DANCE consists of six novel behavioral classifiers trained using a supervised machine learning algorithm. DANCE classifiers address key limitations of rule-based algorithms, capturing dynamic behavioral variations more effectively. DANCE hardware is constructed using repurposed medicine blister packs and acrylic sheets, with recordings performed using smartphones, making it affordable and accessible. Benchmarking demonstrated that DANCE hardware performs comparably to sophisticated, high-cost setups. We validated DANCE in diverse contexts, including social isolation versus enrichment, which modulates aggression and courtship; RNAi-mediated downregulation of the neuropeptide Dsk; and optogenetic silencing of dopaminergic neurons, which promotes aggression. DANCE provides a cost-effective and portable solution for studying Drosophila behaviors in resource-limited settings or near natural habitats. Its accessibility and robust performance democratize behavioral neuroscience, enabling rapid screening of genes and neuronal circuits underlying complex social behaviors.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.2%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
8
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
17
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
23
Genes, Brain and Behavior
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%
26
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%