Back

Development and Validation of a Nutrient Profiling Model for Shopping Baskets: The Grocery Basket Score (GBS)

Marcon, S.; Naef, A.; Faeh, D.; Windisch, P.

2025-01-03 nutrition
10.1101/2025.01.03.25319947 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRating a persons diet as a whole, as opposed to rating individual food items, could help better inform consumers about the health value of their diet. Our goal was to develop an automated health rating of grocery shopping baskets, based on the nutrient composition of all the food items contained within the basket, and without knowing how many people consume the food items over what period of time. It is envisaged that the rating, or score, can be deployed by retailers on top of existing loyalty or digital shopping basket programs. MethodsWe developed a novel model for calculating Grocery Basket Scores (GBS) that uses nutrient energy densities rather than absolute quantities. It was based on self-reported daily food intake from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) as well as mortality follow-up data. We conducted a validation against the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) as well as the Nutri-Score. ResultsThe nutrient energy density (GBS) model penalized consuming calories from sugar and saturated fats, high salt intake, as well as consuming calories from beverages. Furthermore, a penalty was applied to foods that have a low ratio of protein, vitamin C, or iron relative to the total number of calories. Fiber consumption was rewarded. The model showed a high degree of correlation with the AHEI (absolute Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.62 for the AHEI without the protective effect of moderate alcohol consumption and 0.60 with it) and the Nutri-Score (absolute Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.60). ConclusionsThe proposed nutrient energy density model is aligned with the recommendations formulated in nutritional guidelines, as indicated by a high degree of correlation with the AHEI and Nutri-Score. Long term use of a GBS from a single or multiple grocery stores could help consumers adhere to dietary guidelines.

Published in The Journal of Nutrition (predicted rank #8) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.