Back

PHIVE: A Physics-Informed Variational Encoder Enables Rapid Spectral Fitting of Brain Metabolite Mapping at 7T

Shamaei, A.; Niess, E.; Hingerl, L.; Strasser, B.; osburg, a.; eckstein, k.; Bogner, W.; motyka, s.

2025-01-03 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.01.02.25319930 medRxiv
Show abstract

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI) enables non-invasive mapping of brain metabolite concentrations but remains computationally intensive and challenging due to a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and overlapping spectral features. Traditional spectral fitting methods, such as LCModel, are time-consuming and often lack comprehensive uncertainty quantification. In this study, we propose Physics-Informed Variational Encoder (PHIVE), a novel deep learning framework that integrates physics-based priors into a variational autoencoder architecture for rapid and accurate metabo-lite quantification. PHIVE enables simultaneous estimation of metabolite concentrations and uncertainty metrics, including Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB), aleatoric, and epistemic uncertainties. PHIVE was evaluated on whole-brain MRSI data from 7T acquisitions of healthy controls. The method achieved comparable accuracy to LCModel for key metabolites, such as Total N-acetylaspartate (tNAA), Glutamate-Glutamine complex (Glx), and Myo-inositol (mIns) while demonstrating a six-order magnitude reduction in computational time (6 ms per dataset). Uncertainty quantification highlighted PHIVEs robustness in regions with low SNR. Additionally, a conditional baseline modeling approach was introduced, enabling dynamic flexibility in spectral baseline estimation during inference time. These results suggest that PHIVE offers a fast, reliable, and interpretable solution for high-resolution metabolite quantification, paving the way for real-time MRSI applications in clinical and research settings. Future work will focus on expanding its validation across diverse datasets and investigating its utility in longitudinal and multicenter studies.

Published in Medical Image Analysis (predicted rank #7) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.