Back

Comprehensive cerebrospinal fluid analysis indicates key roles for B cells in multiple sclerosis

Fernandez Zapata, C.; Otto, C.; Gallaccio, G.; Chen, Q.; Wang, M.; Uluvar, B.; Teves, M.; Samol, C.; Buthut, M.; Boesl, F.; Dehlinger, A.; Jang, G.; Boettcher, C.; Radbruch, H.; Priller, J.; Schindler, P.; Raposo, C.; Shippling, S.; Pedotti, R.; Kunkel, D.; Pietzner, M.; Franke, C.; Oefner, P.; Gronwald, W.; Pruess, H.; Lohmeier, J.; Paul, F.; Ruprecht, K.; Boettcher, C.

2025-01-06 neurology
10.1101/2025.01.02.24319302 medRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with a multifaceted pathophysiology, likely involving a variety of mechanisms and effectors. To characterize the spectrum of cellular and molecular factors involved in MS at an unprecedented level, we here performed a comprehensive analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood using multiple high-dimensional technologies, including mass cytometry, metabolomics and proteomics (NULISA and Olink Explore(R) 3072). Enriched B cells and proteins involved in B cell functions in the CSF separated MS patients from other neurological disease entities. Specific B cell subpopulations and molecular markers including gut-microbiota-derived metabolites and neurofilament light protein, a marker of neuroaxonal damage, in CSF correlated with clinical (acute vs. stable disease) and/or radiological (gadolinium enhancement) disease activity. Altogether, unbiased broad phenotyping suggests key roles of diverse B subpopulations and B cell related molecular markers in MS, which are associated with both, inflammatory and degenerative aspects of the disease and may serve as disease activity and treatment response biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.