Back

Adaptability and yield stability analysis of food barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in South Gondar zone, Northwest Ethiopia

Worku, A. A.; Fentie, D. B.; Shferaw, S. S.

2025-01-01 genetics
10.1101/2024.12.31.630857 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In food barley, genotype-environment interaction is a frequent occurrence. By identifying stable genotypes across settings, the impact of G x E can be mitigated. Ten food barley genotypes were investigated for yield stability and adaptation in five different environments. The analyses included stability, genotype, and genotype-environment interaction, as well as additive main effect and multiplicative interaction. However, genotype-environment interaction captured 92.98% of the GGE variance. AMMI analysis only explained 27.87% of G and 20.12% of G x E. Five environments were identified using GGE analysis. Of these, Estie2022 (3591.3 kg ha-1) and Debretabor2022 (3494.47 kg ha-1) had the highest grain yields, indicating that they are suitable for the production of food barley, while Lay-Gaynt2023 (2399.82 kg ha-1) had the lowest grain yields, indicating that they are not a suitable environment. The conditions with the best yields were Estie2022, and the lowest-yielding environments were Lay-Gaynt 2023. The two genotypes with the highest yields were HB-1966 (3592.97 kg ha-1) and HB-1965 (3555.17 kg ha-1). Based on yield stability, the genotypes Biftu, followed by Adoshe and Abdene, were the most stable with the highest mean grain yield performance. The genotypes with the highest-yielding performance but relatively the lowest stability were HB-1966 and HB-1965. The genotype HB-1965 was recommended at the Estie2022 and Debretabor2023 testing environments. The ideal environment was represented by Estie2023, and the winning genotype was HB-1966. This suggests that the two winning genotypes were adapted to the specific environments tested in the current study. Whereas Guta and Harbu were adapted to a more diverse environment than the test environments of the South Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.