Back

Food for thought: Rosy-faced lovebirds (Agapornis roseicollis) are capable of associative symbol learning and inference-based quantity discrimination

Wang, S.; Lo, K. C. H.; Shiu, V. W. T.; Hung, C. Y. C.; Poon, E. S. K.; Newman, C.; Buesching, C. D.; Sin, S. Y. W.

2024-12-31 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.12.30.630847 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive capacity for quantity discrimination is highly adaptive in various ecological contexts and subject to convergent evolution across diverse animal species, yet the underlying mechanism involved is not fully understood. Discrimination accuracy generally increases with the ratio between two quantities; however, this ability is expected to differ across ratio ranges. To test this we presented a novel symbol system to 28 rosy-faced lovebirds (Agapornis roseicollis), associating additive tally marks with symbols representing a one-to-one correspondence with different food quantities. Trained lovebirds could spontaneously infer the relative food quantities represented by other symbols. Lovebirds proved capable of (1) associating symbols (i.e., object-file symbolism); with (2) "more-less" quantity inference, by deducing food quantities based on their knowledge of this symbol-quantity association; and (3) enhancing their performance in relation to disparity ratio (conforming to Webers law) and absolute difference. Furthermore (4), the influence of food ratio and absolute difference varied with different ratio ranges. Within a small ratio range ([≤] 3) discrimination performance improved with increments of ratio or absolute difference, whereas within a higher ratio range (> 3), the effect of these factors diminished. We conclude that rosy-faced lovebirds are capable of advanced numeracy and quantity discrimination, similar to larger parrot species.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.3%
2
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
4
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
8
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
9
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
11
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
14
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
21
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%