Stimulant medication use and development of the dopamine system: a naturalistic long-term follow-up of boys and men with ADHD
van der Pal, Z.; Reneman, L.; Mutsaerts, H. J.; Kaiser, A.; Bottelier, M. A.; Geurts, H. M.; Schrantee, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundStimulant medication is commonly used by children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), however its long-lasting effects on the developing brain remain unclear. In a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) we found that short-term stimulant treatment influences the functional brain response to an acute methylphenidate-challenge in an age-dependent manner, in line with animal studies suggesting persisting effects on brain development. MethodsIn this 4-year naturalistic follow-up of the initial RCT, we investigated the long-term age-dependent effects of stimulant treatment on the functional brain response to methylphenidate in male children and adults with ADHD (n=56; adolescents aged 10-17 years, adults aged 23-43 years). At baseline and 4-year follow-up, we used pharmacological MRI to estimate relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) before a single-dose methylphenidate-challenge (resting rCBF) and the rCBF-response to a single-dose methylphenidate-challenge. Linear mixed models were constructed to evaluate the effect of stimulant medication use, age and visit on resting rCBF and rCBF-response. ResultsWe found no evidence for long-term age-dependent effects of stimulant treatment, suggesting that our previously identified short-term effects may be transient. We did identify age-dependent associations between rCBF-response in the medial prefrontal cortex and stimulant treatment, which were already present before treatment initiation but were unrelated to ADHD symptom severity. Moreover, rCBF-response was associated with dopamine D1 receptor distributions in adolescents only. ConclusionsThe identified age-dependent associations may potentially be mediated by changes in dopamine- and noradrenaline-related functioning, and may hold predictive value for (extent of) stimulant medication use after ADHD diagnosis in children and adolescents.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced fronto-striatal volume in ADHD in two cohorts across the lifespan 96%
- Longitudinal alterations in fronto-striatal glutamate are associated with functioning during inhibitory control in autism spectrum disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder 94%
- Structural Brain Alterations and Their Association with Cognitive Function and Symptoms in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Families 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Developmental Changes in Functional Brain Connectivity Associated with Cognitive Functioning in Children and Adolescents with ADHD 92%
- Developing Functional Network Connectivity of the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Mediates Externalizing Psychopathology in Adolescents with Child Neglect 92%
- Lower neural value signaling in the prefrontal cortex is related to childhood family income and depressive symptomatology during adolescence 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Change in Striatal Functional Connectivity Networks Across Two Years Due to Stimulant Exposure in Childhood ADHD: Results from the ABCD Sample 96%
- Methylphenidate stabilizes dynamic brain network organization during tasks probing attention and reward processing in stimulant-naïve children with ADHD 93%
- Gray matter networks associated with cognitive deficit in ADHD across adolescence and adulthood 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Limbic System White Matter in Children and Adolescents with ADHD: A Longitudinal Diffusion MRI Analysis 94%
- Functional brain connectivity predictors of prospective substance use initiation and their environmental correlates 93%
- Clinical and functional connectivity outcomes of 5-Hz repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment in cocaine use disorder: a double-blind randomized controlled trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.