Back

Organ injury accelerates stem cell differentiation by modulating a fate-transducing lateral inhibition circuit

Sanders, E. N.; Sun, H.-T.; Tabatabaee, S.; Lang, C. F.; van Dijk, S. G.; Su, Y.-H.; Labott, A.; Idris, J.; He, L.; Marchetti, M.; Xie, S.; O'Brien, L. E.

2025-02-18 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.12.29.630675 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To rebuild tissue form and function, injured organs accelerate the differentiation of replacement stem cell progeny. Here we demonstrate that injury-induced factors open the throttle on faster differentiation by streamlining the archetypal signaling circuit that patterns cell fates. During normal turnover of the adult Drosophila intestine, fates are patterned by a conserved lateral inhibition circuit: In stem cell pairs, mutual activation of Notch receptor by Delta ligand feeds back to create opposing states of high Notch/low Delta and low Notch/high Delta; cells terminally differentiate once their Notch activity exceeds a fate-deciding threshold. After feeding flies a gut-damaging toxin, we perform in vivo imaging of real-time intestinal repair and trace Notch reporter dynamics in single cells. We find that tissue damage causes the speed of Notch signal activation to accelerate dramatically; faster activation expedites terminal differentiation by propelling cells past the critical Notch threshold more quickly. Combining single-cell analyses with dynamical modeling, we show that faster activation results from aberrant elevation of Delta ligand due to loss of time-delaying circuit feedback. Injury abolishes feedback via a cytokine-JAK-STAT relay from damaged cells to stem cells, causing stem cells to deactivate the Notch co-repressor that normally turns off Delta. Thus, organ injury unmasks latent plasticity in Notch-Delta lateral inhibition to propel the differentiation of new replacement cells. By unifying temporal and spatial fate control in a single, adaptable signaling circuit, organs tune stem cell dynamics to meet environmental challenges.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.