Back

Proteome Analysis of Soybean Root Apoplast Combined with AlphaFold Prediction Reveal Macrophomina phaseolina Infection Strategies and Potential Targets for Engineering Resistance

Veeraganti Naveen Prakash, C.; Sivaramakrishnan, M.; Goel, S.; Porwal, V.; Amrate, P. K.; Shrivastava, M. K.; Chandrasekar, B.

2024-12-29 plant biology
10.1101/2024.12.29.630648 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. is a hemibiotrophic pathogen that causes charcoal rot (CR) disease in various legumes, including soybean. To date, no reliable resistance gene sources have been identified in soybean or other legumes to combat M. phaseolina. Therefore, the identification of mechanistic targets is crucial for improving resistance against the pathogen. The apoplast is a critical region where intense molecular cross-talk occurs between plants and pathogens, and the outcome of their interactions is determined in this compartment. Here, we employed label-free quantitative (LFQ) proteomics to investigate the dynamics of soybean root apoplast during M. phaseolina infection. We have detected several secreted proteins of M. phaseolina and differential regulation of soybean-secreted proteins in root apoplast during infections. Glycome analysis and callose deposition assays have revealed changes in soybean root cell wall compositions and potential polysaccharide targets of M. phaseolina. AlphaFold 2 (AF2) analysis was instrumental in revealing several interesting sequence-unrelated structurally similar (SUSS) effectors and effectors with novel structural folds secreted by M. phaseolina. Structured-guided engineering of protease-inhibitor complexes is emerging as an important strategy to engineer resistance in plants against pathogens. AlphaFold Multimer (AFM) analysis of candidate-secreted proteins from soybean and M. phaseolina has predicted cysteine and serine protease-inhibitor complexes with high confidence. We have validated these interactions using molecular dynamics (MD) and competitive activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) approaches. Therefore, our work provides insights into Soybean-M. phaseolina interactions in the root apoplast and unveil potential candidates for engineering resistance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.2%
2
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.3%
3
Molecular Plant Pathology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
6
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
9
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
13
Journal of Proteomics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
16
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Physiologia Plantarum
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
21
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.6%
24
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%