Influences on rural HPV vaccine hesitancy: A multi-level mixed methods study
Sheinfeld Gorin, S.; Klugas, A.; Stack, M.; Chuisano, S.; Knoll, H.; Jamison, C.; McGrady, A.; Chen, D.; Hyman, R.; DeJonckheere, M.
Show abstract
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection and the leading cause of cervical and oropharyngeal cancers. Vaccination can prevent over 90% of HPV- attributed cancers among those aged 9-26. Rural populations are less likely to receive the complete HPV protocol than urban. The purpose of this convergent mixed methods study was to explore in depth the perspectives that influence hesitancy for HPV vaccination among rural youth, caregivers, and primary care providers in rural Michigan. A mixed methods analysis was conducted to integrate quantitative (cross-sectional PCP survey) and qualitative data (youth, parent focus groups) in a joint display table. Youths and parents reported limited unbiased HPV vaccine information; yet, all responding physicians reported educating their patients about the HPV vaccine. Inductive descriptive analyses revealed that youth wanted a greater role in decision-making about the HPV vaccine, while parents were the PCPs primary focus. Integrative analyses of both qualitative and quantitative data identified parental out-of-pocket costs as significant predictors of lower HPV vaccine uptake. Clinic structural supports were significantly associated with higher HPV vaccine uptake. Adapting evidence-based dissemination approaches to rural primary care physicians could decrease HPV vaccine hesitancy. Youths could be engaged as HPV vaccine champions. Accessing community resources could increase access.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “All of the things to everyone everywhere”: A mixed methods analysis of community perspectives on equitable access to monoclonal antibody treatment for COVID-19 95%
- Implementation strategies to increase human papillomavirus vaccination uptake for adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of intensified health education, SMS/phone tracing and transport reimbursement for uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in a sexually transmitted infections clinic in Malawi: a mixed methods study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 95%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 94%
- COVID-19 vaccine brand hesitancy and other challenges to vaccination in the Philippines 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of extending HPV-based cervical screening intervals from 3 to 5 years: An interview study with women in England 95%
- Exploring Vaccine Hesitancy in Care Home Employees in North West England: A Qualitative Study 95%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Demographic and psychological correlates of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination intentions in a sample of Canadian families 94%
- Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and vaccination: a cross-sectional study of college student knowledge, awareness, and attitudes in Villanova, PA 94%
- Critical success factors for high routine immunization performance: A case study of Nepal 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- “Where the truth really lies”: Listening to voices from African American communities in the Southern States about COVID-19 vaccine information and communication 96%
- Community-based Case Studies of Vaccine Hesitancy and the COVID-19 Response in South Africa; The VaxScenes Study 95%
- Social patterning and stability of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in Scotland: Will those most at risk accept a vaccine? 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.