Back

A Non-Pharmacological, Nociceutical Formulation Lessens Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Cancer Patients

Servitja, S.; Castro Henriques, M.; Alvarez Busto, I.; Medina Castillo, A.; Algarra Garcia, M. A.; Lopez Miranda, E.; Lario Martinez, M.; Luengo Alcazar, M. I.; Borregon, M.; Davo, A.; Gassull Delgado, A.; Roque Garcia, S.; Gonzaga Lopez, A.; Poveda Ferriols, J. M.; Pascal, S.; Ferrandiz Huertas, C.; Mitrol Marinescu, A. M.; Garcia Escolano, M.; Fernandez Carvajal, A.; Ferrer-Montiel, A.

2024-12-30 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.12.29.24319628 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeUp to 80% of patients undergoing taxanes or platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) develop a disturbing peripheral polyneuropathy referred to as CIPN, that affects their treatment compliance to CT and long-term quality of life (QoL). Cumulative evidence shows that taxanes and platinum agents sensitize epidermal nociceptive terminals by potentiating the activity of nociceptor thermosensitive channels. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a non-pharmacological nociceutical formulation acting on epidermal nociceptive endings preventing, delaying and/or lessening CIPN sensory symptoms during CT. MethodsWe designed a proof-of-concept, double-blind, randomized, two-arms multicenter clinical study (NCT06733545). Participants started a daily topical application of the assigned formulation in hands (moisturizing or nociceutical). Upon appearance of neuropathic symptoms in hands and/or feet, they applied the creams twice daily in hands and feet. Diagnosis and follow up of CIPN grade and adverse effects were conducted by study investigators, as well as a QoL questionnaire. ResultsA cohort of 142 patients treated with taxanes and/or platinum agents were randomly assigned to the two groups. Withdrawals were similar in both arms (9 and 14), leading to a balanced number of patients per group (61 moisturizing vs 58 nociceutical). Overall, a similar number of participants developed a peripheral neuropathy in both arms (73% moisturizing vs 67% nociceutical, p=0.1). A lower CIPN incidence in hands was observed in the nociceutical arm (32% vs 13%, p=0.03). Furthermore, the nociceutical formulation delayed the appearance of neuropathic symptoms as compared to the moisturizing cream (6 vs 8 cycle, p=0.009). The Leonard scale questionnaire revealed that the nociceutical formulation attenuated the severity of patients neuropathic symptoms from extremely to hardly any (58% vs. 35%, p<0.0017), increasing patient QoL. ConclusionThis pilot study suggests that topical protection of nociceptive epidermal terminals with a topical nociceutical formulation reduced the incidence of CIPN in hands, delayed its onset and increased the QoL of patients. These findings provide solid evidence for a larger, confirmatory clinical study.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
5
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
7
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
8
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
13
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
17
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
26
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
30
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%