Back

Calcium dynamics tune developmental tempo to generate evolutionarily divergent axon tract lengths

Lindhout, F. W.; Szafranska, H. M.; Imaz-Rosshandler, I.; Guglielmi, L.; Moarefian, M.; Voitiuk, K.; Zernicka-Glover, N. K.; Lloyd-Davies Sanchez, D. J.; Minnick, J.; Teodorescu, M.; Lancaster, M. A.

2024-12-28 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.12.28.630576 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The human brain has undergone an evolutionary expansion in size, both in terms of cell numbers and the size of cellular structures, including axon tracts. Human brain development also progresses slowly and takes particularly long. However, the functional relevance of slowed timing, and whether it is responsible for these changes in size, remains unknown. Here, we investigate this by studying axon tract development in human and mouse brain organoids. We demonstrate that human axon tracts grow [~]2x more slowly than those of mice, reflecting their slowed tempo, but that this actually leads to shorter human axons, not longer. To overcome the effect of slowed tempo, human axons have a more prolonged growth duration that enables them to project farther despite their slower growth rate. Using a combination of single-cell RNA sequencing and live imaging, we demonstrate that the prolonged duration involves a different mechanism to that controlling tempo and is driven by calcium dynamics. Human axons exhibit a reduced calcium influx compared to mouse, mediated by L-Type voltage-gated calcium channels. Stimulating this calcium influx in human neurons triggers earlier cessation of growth, leading to shorter axon tracts similar to those of mouse. We further show that increasing calcium speeds up the transition to the synaptogenesis stage. Thus, calcium regulation sets the timing of transitions to disproportionately extend developmental duration, thereby enabling evolutionary expansion of human neurons.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.