Back

Relationship Between Actual Stress And In Situ Morphological Changes In The Mechanical Behavior Of Biomimetic Porous Hierarchical Scaffolds

Marchiori, G.; Sancisi, N.; Tozzi, G.; Zingales, M.; Prezioso, G.; Visani, A.; Zucchelli, A.; Sensini, A.

2024-12-27 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.12.27.630537 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study investigates the evolution with strain of the material volume fraction (i.e., porosity) and geometry in porous scaffolds to obtain a more accurate description of their stress-strain behavior. Single bundles and hierarchical structures (8 bundles enveloped by a membrane) were produced by electrospinning as tendon/ligament scaffolds. They underwent a micro-tomography in situ tensile test. Apparent and net stress were obtained using the initial sample cross-section and material volume fraction to normalize axial force. Micro-tomography revealed sample morphology change with strain to calculate the actual stress-strain. Moreover, nanofibers arrangement was revealed by scanning electron microscopy on both bundles and membranes. The description of the mechanical response significantly changed using evolving morphometry (actual stress-strain) instead of initial static one (apparent stress-strain), for both single bundle and hierarchical structure. The actual elastic modulus of the single bundles (583{+/-}97 MPa) was statistically higher than that of the hierarchical structures (163{+/-}107 MPa). This is related to the membrane, membrane-bundle and inter-bundle interactions. In the hierarchical structure, portions of the material resisting traction are constituted by nanofibers not aligned with the load. The different definitions for the stress-strain behavior allow different accuracy levels depending on the experimental complexity. The evolution of morphology with deformation can significantly affect the description of the mechanical response of porous scaffolds. This has a double impact in practical applications: at the body scale, it allows a better comparison between the scaffold behavior and the target tissue; at the cellular scale, it predicts the actual substrate stiffness that cells will face. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=104 SRC="FIGDIR/small/630537v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (24K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5d5337org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1027047org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11966a9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a2e4e3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.7%
2
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
6
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
10
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
16
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
19
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
21
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%