Back

Morphometric Identification of Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons: A Data-Driven Approach

Panday, M.; Monteiro, L.; Daudi, A.; Murphy, K. M.

2024-12-27 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.12.27.630528 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Traditionally, anatomical studies of parvalbumin-positive (PV+) labelled interneurons describe them as a homogeneous population of neurons. In contrast, recent single-cell RNAseq studies have identified multiple transcriptomically distinct categories of PV+ cells. That difference between a single anatomical category of PV+ neurons and multiple transcriptomic categories presents a problem in understanding the role of these neurons in cortical function. One gap that might contribute to this discrepancy is that PV+ morphology is typically addressed using qualitative descriptions and simple quantifications, while single-cell RNAseq studies use big data and high dimensional analyses. PV+ neurons play critical roles in the experience-dependent development of the cortex and are often involved in disease-related changes associated with neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. Here, we developed a modern data-driven analysis pipeline to quantify PV+ morphology. We quantified 97 morphometric features from 14274 PV+ neurons and applied unsupervised clustering that identified 13 different PV+ morphologies. We extended the analysis to compare PV+ dendritic arbour patterns and cell body morphologies. Finally, we compared the morphologies of PV+ neurons with the cell body morphologies of neurons expressing various genes associated with PV+ transcriptomic cell types. This approach identified a range of PV+ morphologies similar to the number of transcriptomic categories. It also found that the PV+ morphologies have cortical area, laminar, and transcriptomic biases that might contribute to cortical function.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.