Sex Disparities in Cognitive Impairment Research: A Scoping Review in Informatics Literature
Garg, M.; Liu, X.; Lin, J.; Vassilaki, M.; Petersen, R. C.; St. Sauver, J.; Kapoor, E.; Sohn, S.
Show abstract
RationaleA scoping review was conducted to investigate knowledge gaps in the informatics research literature regarding sex differences in cognitive decline, identifying existing studies and areas where further studies are needed. Materials and MethodsWe searched Ovid and other databases for studies on sex differences and cognitive decline, focusing on publications in peer-reviewed informatics journals and conference proceedings from 2000 to 2023. The selected manuscripts were analyzed and summarized through discussion among three reviewers. ResultsA total of 13 articles were selected and examined for metadata and attributes analysis. Most studies are conducted in United States (n=5) and European Union (n=4), about a half are published after 2020 (n=6), and most studies are published in Springer and Elsevier. Our attributes-based analysis highlights the different aspects of reported studies such as task, method, dataset and its size, and sex-specific inferences. DiscussionSex-specific disparities in cognitive decline remain a critical issue in healthcare, yet most informatics research has primarily concentrated on identifying basic sex differences, such as tracking the progression of cognitive decline in men and women. While these studies are valuable, they fall short of addressing the more complex underlying causes of these sex-specific disparities in progression of cognitive decline. ConclusionThere is a significant gap using informatics in understanding how biological, social, and behavioral factors contribute to sex-specific disparities. This limited focus restricts the development of effective intervention strategies for mitigating sex-specific differences in cognitive health outcomes, underscoring the need for more comprehensive research that goes beyond mere identification to find the root cause of these disparities in healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between motor task acquisition and hippocampal atrophy across cognitively unimpaired, amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease individuals 93%
- Quantitative longitudinal predictions of Alzheimer's disease by multi-modal predictive learning 92%
- Towards the development of a management protocol for Subjective Cognitive Decline: insights from a cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of multimodal clinical data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world datasets for the International Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other registries: an international consensus 94%
- Representation of Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations in Dementia Prevention Trials: A Systematic Review 93%
- Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for the Early Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review of the impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia 94%
- Optimising activity and diet compositions for dementia prevention: Protocol for the ACTIVate prospective longitudinal cohort study 93%
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of cognitive decline using a single-channel EEG with an interactive assessment tool 93%
- Everyday functioning in a community-based volunteer population: Differences between participant- and study partner-report 93%
- Enriching hippocampal memory function in older adults through real-world exploration 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.