COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Studies among Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 120 Observational Studies and Randomized Clinical Trials
mohammadi, s.; isay, M. M.; Khogali Osman, A.; Widi Saraswati, P.; Zuithoff, N. P. A.; Weibel, D.; Sturkenboom, M.; Ahmadizar, F.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDThe COVID-19 vaccines were rapidly developed and tested, but concerns about vaccine-related adverse events remain, especially in vulnerable groups like pregnant women, children, and those with certain health conditions. This review aims to summarize rates of such adverse events in individuals often not included in randomized clinical trials (RCT). METHODFrom December 2019 to February 2022, we searched Embase and Medline for observational studies and RCTs on adverse events post-COVID-19 vaccination in vulnerable groups. We examined serious and non-serious events in individuals with specific medical conditions, infants, children, pregnant individuals, and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals. Cumulative risks for all events were calculated. The Incidence rate (IR) and 95% confidence intervals were reported for those studies that met the follow-up period criteria based on the referenced literature. For events with data on exposed and unexposed groups, we calculated the odds ratio. Pooled incidence rates were calculated per 1000 person-days using a random-effects model. Sub-group analyses were conducted based on vaccine types and doses, with heterogeneity assessed using I2. FINDINGSOf the 4,254 papers, 235 met eligibility criteria, including 120 studies with 171,073 participants (113 observational, eight RCTs. We examined 17 severe and 7 non-severe adverse event categories. Lymphadenopathy (IR: 1.95[1.20;3.19]), autoimmune disease and multiple sclerosis flare-up (1.13 [0.47;2.68]), and cardiac symptoms (0.26[0.00;10.58]) were the most severe events. Allergic reactions were more common among autoimmune (7.03[4.10;12.06]) and cancer (4.87[2.21;10.76]) groups. vaccinees who received the second dose of vaccine had higher proportions of disease flare-ups (39.27 [18.08;85.31] vs 22.13 [10.22; 47.93]); cardiac symptoms (6.11[2.05-18.22] vs 3.78[2.53-5.65]); and cardiac events (5.34[1.69;16.90] vs 5.05[1.40,18.19]) in observational studies. INTERPRETATIONThis review highlights COVID-19 vaccine safety in vulnerable populations, enhancing vaccination strategies. Further real-world research is needed to validate and extend our findings, especially in addressing safety gaps among vulnerable groups.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529): A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression 96%
- Effectiveness of the WHO-authorized Covid-19 Vaccines: a Rapid Review of Global Reports till June 30, 2021 96%
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of inactivated and Ad5-nCoV COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA. 2 variant infection, severe illness, and death 94%
- Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, July – November 2021 93%
- Age and product dependent vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalisation among adults in Norway: a national cohort study, January – September 2021 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines in Immunocompromised Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Using the GRADE Framework 95%
- Facing the Omicron variant – How well do vaccines protect against mild and severe COVID-19? Third interim analysis of a living systematic review 95%
- Shared Clinical and Immunologic Features of mRNA Vaccines: Preliminary Results from a Comparative Clinical Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 94%
- Quality and methodological heterogeneity of COVID-19 vaccine safety studies focusing on the myocarditis safety signal: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression 94%
- Safety of COVID-19 vaccines, their components or their platforms for pregnant women: A rapid review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting COVID-19 booster immunogenicity against future SARS-CoV-2 variants and the benefits of vaccine updates 94%
- Duration of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in Qatar 94%
- Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a new SARS-CoV-2 recombinant Gamma variant RBD-based protein adjuvanted vaccine, used as heterologous booster in healthy adults: a Phase 1 interim report 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.