Back

Aggression experience and observation promote shared behavioral and neural changes

Falkner, A. L.; Iravedra Garcia, J. M.; Guthman, E. M.; Cuturela, L. I.; Ocasio-Arce, E. J.; Pillow, J. W.

2024-12-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.12.26.630396 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The ability to observe the social behavior of others and use observed information to bias future action is a fundamental building block of social cognition1,2. A foundational question is whether social observation and experience engage common circuit mechanisms that enable behavioral change. While classic studies on social learning have shown that aggressive behaviors can be learned through observation3, it remains unclear whether aggression observation promotes persistent neural changes that generalize to new contexts. Here, to directly compare the effects of aggression experience and observation at brain-wide scale, we develop a strategy to perform large-scale cell-type specific recordings across subcortical networks for social behavior control and learning. We record longitudinally while animals "train" through direct experience or observation, then probe shared differences in behavior and neural activity in a novel "hard" aggression context. Using supervised and unsupervised methods for behavioral quantification, we detect unique signatures of a shared behavioral strategy not present in animals with no training. During observation, we find widespread activation that mimics experience in networks for behavior generation, with critical differences in signals associated with reward and threat learning. After observation, we observe that changes persist into the novel aggression context, with increased similarity in the neural dynamics between experience and observation groups. Network-level modeling reveals persistent shared changes to a core aggression network, with widespread decoupling of inhibition from a key hypothalamic output region. This demonstrates that "experience-like" activity during observation can recruit a shared plasticity mechanism that biases behavior toward adaptive defensive strategies in new contexts.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.