Aggression experience and observation promote shared behavioral and neural changes
Falkner, A. L.; Iravedra Garcia, J. M.; Guthman, E. M.; Cuturela, L. I.; Ocasio-Arce, E. J.; Pillow, J. W.
Show abstract
The ability to observe the social behavior of others and use observed information to bias future action is a fundamental building block of social cognition1,2. A foundational question is whether social observation and experience engage common circuit mechanisms that enable behavioral change. While classic studies on social learning have shown that aggressive behaviors can be learned through observation3, it remains unclear whether aggression observation promotes persistent neural changes that generalize to new contexts. Here, to directly compare the effects of aggression experience and observation at brain-wide scale, we develop a strategy to perform large-scale cell-type specific recordings across subcortical networks for social behavior control and learning. We record longitudinally while animals "train" through direct experience or observation, then probe shared differences in behavior and neural activity in a novel "hard" aggression context. Using supervised and unsupervised methods for behavioral quantification, we detect unique signatures of a shared behavioral strategy not present in animals with no training. During observation, we find widespread activation that mimics experience in networks for behavior generation, with critical differences in signals associated with reward and threat learning. After observation, we observe that changes persist into the novel aggression context, with increased similarity in the neural dynamics between experience and observation groups. Network-level modeling reveals persistent shared changes to a core aggression network, with widespread decoupling of inhibition from a key hypothalamic output region. This demonstrates that "experience-like" activity during observation can recruit a shared plasticity mechanism that biases behavior toward adaptive defensive strategies in new contexts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mixed representations of choice direction and outcome by GABA/glutamate cotransmitting neurons in the entopeduncular nucleus 97%
- Response outcome gates the effect of spontaneous cortical state fluctuations on perceptual decisions 96%
- Distinct Neuronal Populations Contribute to Trace Conditioning and Extinction Learning in the Hippocampal CA1 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heightened lateral habenula activity during stress produces brainwide and behavioral substrates of susceptibility 98%
- A direct lateral entorhinal cortex to hippocampal CA2 circuit conveys social information required for social memory 96%
- Neural dynamics in the limbic system during male social behaviors 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.