Back

Fine-scale co-ocurrence patterns in grasslands reflect competition for space rather than broad plant strategies

Genin, A.; Devresse, L.; Garnier, E.; Coq, S.

2024-12-25 ecology
10.1101/2024.12.25.630317 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIEstimating the sign and strength of interactions among plants is central to understand the dynamics and functioning of communities, but is challenging to do for species-rich communities. Instead, spatial relationships between plants (clustering or spatial segregation) are sometimes used as a surrogate for the net effect of interactions ocurring between plants (positive or negative, respectively). However, this approach remains poorly tested outside of arid and alpine ecosystems, the ecological settings it originated from. C_LIO_LIIn experimental rangelands, we explored how management intensification, sheep exclusion and a natural soil depth gradient control the level of plant spatial segregation, or negative co-occurrence, usually considered as a measurement of competition intensity. We link these spatial patterns to classical broad plant strategies defined by 11 locally measured functional traits, and to the realized vegetation height and cover. C_LIO_LIPlant segregation was highest when both grazing and fertilization were applied. Unexpectedly, general plant strategies (competitive, and acquisitive strategies) had little relationship with plant spatial patterns. Instead, spatial constraints increased segregation wherever cover was high and free bare ground was limited, or where plant growth is restricted by grazing to a few centimeters above ground. C_LIO_LIThese results show that fine-scale spatial patterns appear to capture competition for space, rather than for light or resources, as suggested by broad plant strategies. This may explain discrepancies in conclusions drawn from spatial patterns in grasslands, and clarifies the way towards a mechanistic understanding of spatial patterns. C_LIO_LISynthesis. The fine scale spatial organization of plant communities has been thought to reflect the intensity of competition among plants, but this approach has struggled to provide consistent results in grasslands. We show here that spatial patterns reflect competition for space rather than broad plant strategies captured by plant functional traits, helping us read observed plant spatial patterns to map interactions among plants in the field. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
7
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.7%
14
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
19
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
27
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
30
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%