Back

Evolution of genetic variance and its consequences oneco-evolutionary response in complex mutualistic networks

Baruah, G.; Wittmann, M. F.

2024-12-25 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.12.25.630074 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rising temperatures threaten biodiversity and ecosystem resilience by disrupting phenological synchrony in plant-pollinator networks. These interactions, essential for ecosystem functioning, are sensitive to temperature shifts. We model species eco-evolutionary responses to an abrupt temperature increase, comparing evolution in mean trait alone versus evolution involving both the mean and genetic variance. We show that networks where species evolve in both their mean phenotype and genetic variance exhibit increased resilience to temperature shifts. Hyper-generalist species, engaged in extensive mutualistic interactions, accumulate greater genetic variance, thereby facilitating faster evolutionary rescue under strong selective pressures. Specialists also benefit by interacting with these hyper-generalists, which stabilize adaptation to new temperatures. We observe emergence in opposing selection pressures in complex networks that promote increases in genetic variance ("evolvability"), reducing trait lag, enabling faster adaptation, and increasing survival. Our findings highlight the role of evolving genetic variance and network architecture in mitigating plant-pollinator phenotypic mismatches under rising environmental temperatures. This study provides insights into the adaptive capacity of mutualistic networks, highlighting dynamic genetic variance changes as key to resilience amid accelerating climate warming. Our study highlights the importance of feedbacks between network topology and genetic architecture for conservation under climate change.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.