Back

Assessment of Contralateral Efferent Effects in Human Via ECochG

Verschooten, E.; Strickland, E. A.; Verhaert, N.; Joris, P. X.

2024-12-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.12.24.630246 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Efferent projections from the brainstem to the inner ear are well-described anatomically and physiologically but their precise function remains debated. The medial olivocochlear (MOC) system and its reflex, the MOCR, have been particularly well studied. In animals, anatomical and physiological data are fine-grained and extensive and suggest an important role for the MOCR in anti-masking e.g. to improve the detection of tones in background noise. Extensive behavioral studies in human support this role, but direct linking of behavioral paradigms to the MOCR is challenging because of the difficulty in obtaining appropriate human neural measures. We developed a new approach in which mass potentials were recorded near the cochlea of normal hearing and awake human volunteers to increase the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio, and examined whether broadband noise to the contralateral ear elicited MOCR anti-masking effects as reported in animals. Probing the mass potential to the onset of brief tones at 4 and 6 kHz, convincing anti-masking or suppressive effects consistent with the MOCR were not detected. We then changed the recording technique to examine the neural phase-locked contribution to the mass potential in response to long, low-frequency tones, and found that contralateral sound suppressed neural responses in a systematic and progressive manner. We followed up with psychophysical experiments in which we found that contralateral noise elevated detection threshold for tones up to 4 kHz. Our study provides a new way to study efferent effects in the human peripheral auditory system and shows that contralateral efferent effects are biased towards low frequencies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.1%
3
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
5
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
7
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
8
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.0%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
21
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%