Neural differences in conflict monitoring and stimulus expectancy processes in experienced meditators are likely driven by enhanced attention
Hill, A. T.; Chung, S. W.; Emonson, M.; Corcoran, A. W.; Fitzgibbon, B. M.; Fitzgerald, P. B.; Bailey, N. W.
Show abstract
ObjectivesMindfulness meditation has been linked to enhanced attention and executive function, likely resulting from practice-related effects on neural activity patterns. In this study, we used an event-related potential (ERP) paradigm to examine brain responses related to conflict monitoring and attention in experienced mindfulness meditators to better understand key factors driving meditation-related effects. MethodsWe measured electroencephalography-derived N2 and P3 ERPs reflecting conflict monitoring and attention processes from 35 meditators and 29 non-meditators across both an easy and a hard Go/Nogo task (50% Nogo and 25% Nogo stimuli, respectively). ResultsMeditators displayed distinct neural activity patterns compared to non-meditators, with enhanced N2 responses in fronto-midline electrodes following hard Nogo trials (pFDR = 0.011, np2 = 0.111). The fronto-midline N2 ERP was also larger following Nogo trials than Go trials, in the harder task condition, and was related to correct responses. Meditators also exhibited a more frontally distributed P3 ERP in the easy task compared to the hard task, while non-meditators showed a more frontally distributed P3 ERP in the hard task (pFDR = 0.015, np2 = 0.079). ConclusionsMindfulness meditation was associated with distinct topographical patterns of neural activity in the attention task, without corresponding increases in global neural activity amplitudes. These meditation-related effects appear to be driven by attention-specific mechanisms, despite the examined neural activity being associated with conflict monitoring and stimulus expectancy. Our findings suggest that the cognitive benefits of meditation may only emerge in tasks that actively engage targeted cognitive processes, such as sustained attention.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Intelligence and Visual Mismatch Negativity: Is Pre-Attentive Visual Discrimination Related to General Cognitive Ability? 97%
- Curiosity satisfaction increases event-related potentials sensitive to reward 97%
- Involuntary orienting and conflict resolution during auditory attention: The role of ventral and dorsal streams 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconsidering electrophysiological markers of response inhibition in light of trigger failures in the stop-signal task 97%
- Repetition Attenuates the Influence of Recency on Recognition Memory: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence 96%
- The P600 and P3 ERP components are linked to the task-evoked pupillary response as a correlate of norepinephrine activity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Usefulness of a familiarity signal during recognition depends on test format: Neurocognitive evidence for a core assumption of the CLS framework 96%
- Relationships between individual differences in dual process and electrophysiological signatures of familiarity and recollection during retrieval 96%
- The relationship between multisensory associative learning and multisensory integration 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A thin line between conflict and reaction time effectson EEG and fMRI brain signals 96%
- Response-locked theta dissociations reveal potential feedback signal following successful retrieval 95%
- Role of the prefrontal cortex in musical and verbal short-term memory: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.