Does combination treatment with progesterone and vaginal cervical cerclage improve pregnancy outcomes in women at high risk of preterm birth? A retrospective, secondary analysis of the C-STICH suture thread for cerclage trial data
Hodgetts Morton, V.; Morris, R.; Toozs-Hobson, P.; Middleton, L.; Pilarski, N.; Bell, L.; Hogg, M.; Man, R.; Israfil-Bayli, F.; Shennan, A.; Simpson, N.; Lees, C.; Moakes, C. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundVaginal cervical cerclage and progesterone are established treatments for prevention of pregnancy loss and prematurity. There is limited data to assess the effect of these treatments in combination. ObjectiveTo investigate the association between progesterone and no progesterone treatment on pregnancy outcomes in women at high risk of preterm birth who have received a vaginal cervical cerclage. Study DesignThis is a secondary analysis of women recruited to the CSTICH trial, which recruited in 75 obstetric units in the UK. The primary outcome was pregnancy loss, defined as miscarriage and perinatal mortality, including any stillbirth or neonatal death in the first week of life. Secondary maternal outcomes included miscarriage and previable neonatal death; stillbirth; gestational age at delivery; preterm pre labour rupture of membranes and sepsis. Secondary neonatal outcomes included early/late neonatal death and sepsis. For each outcome, regression models were fitted adjusting for pre-specified prognostic variables. Results1943 women had a vaginal cerclage placed, with available progesterone data. From the 2048 women recruited to CSTICH; 843 (43%) women received progesterone and 1109 (57%) did not receive progesterone. Pregnancy loss occurred in 49 (5.9%) of 832 women who received progesterone and 91 (8.3%) of 1103 women who did not receive progesterone (adjusted risk ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50 to 0.99; adjusted risk difference - 0.02, 95% CI: -0.04 to -0.001). ConclusionThere appears to be an association with progesterone use in women who receive a vaginal cervical cerclage and a reduction in pregnancy loss. This combination therapy may be an important opportunity to further reduce the risk of pregnancy loss in this high risk cohort.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduction in Spontaneous and Iatrogenic Preterm Births in Twin Pregnancies During COVID-19 Lockdown in Melbourne, Australia: A Multicenter Cohort Study 96%
- Corticosteroids for improving patient relevant outcomes in HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Comparison of first trimester dating methods for gestational age estimation and their implication on preterm birth classification in a North Indian cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of caesarean birth on perinatal mortality for singleton breech presentation in spontaneous preterm labour – a target trial emulation using Scottish health record data 97%
- Urinary prostaglandin metabolites as biomarkers for human labour: Insights into future predictors 94%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 94%
- Out-of-hospital births and the experiences of emergency ambulance clinicians and birthing parents: A scoping review of the literature 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of preterm birth: a collaboration using large routine health datasets 94%
- Assessing the impact of maternal blood pressure during pregnancy on perinatal health: A wide-angled Mendelian randomization study 91%
- Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.