Back

Distinct Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Transcriptomic Signatures Reveal Transcription Alone Is Insufficient to Determine Glucose-Induced Transcriptomic Dynamics

Bagheri, A.; Kim, J.; Jiang, P.

2024-12-22 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.12.22.629974 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glucose profoundly influences cellular transcriptomes, but whether these changes are primarily driven by transcription remains unclear. Traditional bulk RNA sequencing, which interrogates total mRNA from whole cells, obscures distinct dynamics of nuclear and cytoplasmic transcriptomes. Nuclear RNA levels primarily reflect transcriptional activity, whereas cytoplasmic RNA levels are shaped by both transcription and post-transcriptional processes, such as RNA export, stability, and degradation. In this study, we systematically investigate glucose-induced transcriptomic responses in a subcellular location- and cell type-specific manner using three cell lines: FHC (normal colonic epithelial cells), MCF10A (normal breast epithelial cells), and MCF7 (metastatic breast cancer cells). Our findings reveal that, although nuclear and cytoplasmic mRNA levels show strong global correlations, glucose-induced changes in mRNA abundance exhibit minimal concordance between the nucleus and cytoplasm. Additionally, glucose-induced changes in exon inclusion levels often diverge between the nucleus and cytoplasm, underscoring the importance of post-transcriptional processes in shaping the cytoplasmic transcriptome response to glucose level changes. Glucose-induced differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially spliced exons ({Delta}PSI) are enriched in distinct pathways exhibiting unique enrichment patterns depending on the subcellular location and cell line. These findings underscore the complexity of glucose-induced transcriptomic regulation, demonstrating that transcription alone is insufficient to explain the observed dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.