Back

In vivo changes in zebrafish anesthetic sensitivity in response to the loss of kif5Aa are associated with the alteration of mitochondrial motility

Bedell, V.; Dubey, P.; Datta, R.; Eckenhoff, R. G.

2024-12-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.12.20.629838 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Anesthetic and sedative drugs are small compounds known to bind to hundreds of proteins. One intriguing binding partner of propofol is the kinesin motor domain, kif5A, a neuronal mitochondrial transport protein. Here, we used zebrafish WT and kif5Aa KO larval behavioral assays to assess anesthetic sensitivity and combined that with zebrafish primary neuronal cell culture to probe for alteration in mitochondrial motility. We found that the loss of kif5Aa increases behavioral sensitivity to propofol and etomidate, with etomidate hypersensitivity greater than propofol. In contrast, kif5Aa KO animals were resistant to the behavioral effects of dexmedetomidine. Finally, WT and kif5Aa KO larvae responded similarly to the behavioral effects of ketamine. Propofol inhibited the anterograde motility of mitochondria in WT zebrafish neurons, while etomidate inhibited mitochondrial motility in both anterograde and retrograde directions; neither drug altered mitochondrial motility in the kif5Aa knockout (KO) neurons. In contrast, dexmedetomidine enhanced retrograde mitochondrial motility in both WT and kif5Aa KO animals. Finally, ketamine had little significant effect on mitochondrial motility in either mutant or WT animals. These data demonstrate that each anesthetic/sedative drug affects the motor protein machinery uniquely and is associated with unique changes in behavior. Understanding how different anesthetic compounds alter neuron motor proteins will be important in defining how anesthetics alter neuronal signaling and energetic dynamics.

Published in PLOS One · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.