Back

Towards the implementation and interpretation of masked ICA for identifying signatures of autonomic activation in the brainstem with resting-state BOLD fMRI

Miedema, M. E.; Pattinson, K. T. S.; Mitsis, G. D.

2024-12-20 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.12.20.628885 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brainstem is the site of key exchanges between the autonomic and central nervous systems but has historically presented a challenging target for study with BOLD fMRI. A potentially powerful although under-characterized approach to identifying nucleic activation within the brainstem is masked independent component analysis (mICA), which restricts signal decomposition to the brainstem itself, thus aiming to reduce the strong effect of physiological noise in nearby regions such as ventricles and large arteries. In this study, we systematically investigate the use of mICA to uncover signatures of autonomic activation in the brainstem at rest. We apply mICA on 40 subjects in a high-resolution resting state 7T dataset following different strategies for dimensionality selection, denoising, and component classification. We show that among the noise mitigation techniques investigated, cerebrospinal fluid denoising makes the largest impact in terms of mICA outcomes. We further demonstrate that across preprocessing pipelines and previously reported results the majority of components are spatially reproducible, but temporal outcomes differ widely depending on denoising strategy. Evaluating both hand-labelling and whole-brain specificity criteria, we develop an intuitive framework for mICA classifications. Finally, we make a comparison between mICA and atlas-based segmentations of brainstem nuclei, finding little consistency between these two approaches. Based on our evaluation of the effects of methodology on mICA and its relationship to other signals of interest in the brainstem, we provide recommendations for future uses of mICA to identify autonomically-relevant BOLD fluctuations in subcortical structures.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.4%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.9%
3
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
6
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
12
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
14
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
20
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
22
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%