Back

Prevalence of AI findings on Chest X-ray in patients with lung cancer: a cross-sectional cohort study

Bramley, R.; Broadhurst, P.; Sharman, A.; Robert, D.; Weber, E.; Simon, M.; Naseer, R.; Brown, L.; Grundy, S.; Evison, M.

2024-12-21 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.12.20.24319410 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChest X-ray Radiography (CXR) is the primary investigation for patients with potential symptoms of lung cancer in the UK. Artificial intelligence (AI) can detect abnormalities on CXR and prioritise cases for reporting. We describe a method to determine which AI findings are associated with lung cancer to inform and validate prioritisation strategies. MethodsThis multicentre study compared the prevalence of AI findings on CXR in a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with lung cancer (4408 CXR) to the prevalence of AI findings in a prospective cohort of CXR from the referral population (107,065 CXR). Nineteen AI findings were assessed individually and in combination. ResultsThe most common AI findings in patients with lung cancer compared to the referral population were Abnormal (92.6% vs 60.9%), Opacity (83.4% vs 45.4%), Consolidation (36.9% vs 12.9%), Atelectasis (33.5% vs 20.9%) and Nodule (32.7% vs 10.9%). The finding most associated with cancer based on the prevalence ratio in the cancer and referral cohorts were Lung nodule malignancy (13.3), Cavity (4.0), Tracheal deviation (3.1), Nodule (3.0) and Consolidation (2.9). The percentage of CXR classed as AI Abnormal varied by the referral cohort, 63.5% from Accident & Emergency vs 43.0% from General Practice. This suggests significant variation in the complexity of cases across referral pathways. ConclusionIndividual AI findings had limited sensitivity in detecting lung cancer. Using combinations of AI findings significantly improved cancer detection rates but required prioritising a larger proportion of CXR from the referral population. Key messages What is already known on this topicThe National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) early value assessment of "Artificial intelligence-derived software to analyse CXR for suspected lung cancer in primary care referrals" has identified the need for more research on the ability of AI to identify normal and abnormal findings on CXR to enable prioritised reporting of and speed up the cancer pathway. What this study addsThis study describes a method that sites deploying AI can use to determine the relative prevalence of AI finding on CXR in patients with lung cancer and in the referral population. The results indicate that prioritisation approaches focusing on single abnormalities such as lung nodule detection will miss most lung cancers on CXR. How this study might affect research, practice or policyPrioritisation strategies need to optimise the detection of lung cancer and other significant pathology. Using AI to prioritise abnormal CXR requires ethical consideration as moving some patients to the front of the reporting queue can also have a detrimental effect on patients that are not prioritised. This study indicates a range of AI findings need to be prioritised to maximise the detection rate of lung cancer.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.