Diazepam modulates hippocampal CA1 functional connectivity in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis
Livingston, N. R.; Kiemes, A.; O'Daly, O.; Knight, S. R.; Lukow, P.; Jelen, L. A.; Reilly, T. J.; Dima, A.; Nettis, M. A.; Casetta, C.; Devenyi, G. A.; Spencer, T.; De Micheli, A.; Fusar Poli, P.; Grace, A. A.; Williams, S. C. R.; McGuire, P.; Chakravarty, M. M.; Egerton, A.; Modinos, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundPreclinical evidence suggests that diazepam enhances hippocampal {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling and normalises a psychosis-relevant cortico-limbic-striatal circuit. Hippocampal network dysconnectivity, particularly from the CA1 subfield, is evident in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P), representing a potential treatment target. This study aimed to forward-translate this preclinical evidence. MethodsIn this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 18 CHR-P individuals underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging twice, once following a 5mg dose of diazepam and once following a placebo. They were compared to 20 healthy controls (HC) who did not receive diazepam/placebo. Functional connectivity (FC) between the hippocampal CA1 subfield and the nucleus accumbens (NAc), amygdala, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) was calculated. Mixed-effects models investigated the effect of group (CHR-P placebo/diazepam vs. HC) and condition (CHR-P diazepam vs. placebo) on CA1-to-region FC. ResultsIn the placebo condition, CHR-P individuals showed significantly lower CA1-vmPFC (Z=3.17, PFWE=0.002) and CA1-NAc (Z=2.94, PFWE=0.005) FC compared to HC. In the diazepam compared to placebo condition, CA1-vmPFC FC was significantly increased (Z=4.13, PFWE=0.008) in CHR-P individuals, and both CA1-vmPFC and CA1-NAc FC were normalised to HC levels. In contrast, compared to HC, CA1-amygdala FC was significantly lower contralaterally and higher ipsilaterally in CHR-P individuals in both the placebo and diazepam conditions (lower: placebo Z=3.46, PFWE=0.002, diazepam Z=3.33, PFWE=0.003; higher: placebo Z=4.48, PFWE<0.001, diazepam Z=4.22, PFWE<0.001). ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that diazepam can partially restore hippocampal CA1 dysconnectivity in CHR-P individuals, suggesting that modulation of GABAergic function might be useful in the treatment of this clinical group.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of Diazepam on Hippocampal Blood Flow in People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis 98%
- Interactions between hippocampal activity and striatal dopamine in people at clinical high risk for psychosis: relationship to clinical outcomes 97%
- Frontal lobe fALFF measured from resting-state fMRI at baseline predicts acute treatment response in first episode psychosis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Replication of a neuroimaging biomarker for striatal dysfunction in psychosis 97%
- Molecular and micro-architectural mapping of abnormal gray matter developmental trajectories in psychosis 96%
- Cortical and Subcortical Neuroanatomical Signatures of Schizotypy in 3,004 Individuals Assessed in a Worldwide ENIGMA Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse clinical outcomes in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis related to activity and glutamate function in the hippocampus 97%
- Pairwise genetic meta-analyses between schizophrenia and substance dependence phenotypes reveals novel association signals 94%
- Evaluating the role of common risk variation in the recurrence risk of schizophrenia in multiplex schizophrenia families 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal Changes in Functional Connectivity in Antipsychotic-treated and Antipsychotic-naive Patients with First Episode Psychosis 97%
- Thinner cortex is associated with psychosis onset in individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group mega-analysis 96%
- Evidence for a serotonergic subtype of major depressive disorder: A NeuroPharm-1 study. 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.