Back

Impact of spatial aggregation on detection of spatiotemporal disease clusters: analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infections in 3-D high-density settings

Allison, K.; Lover, A. A.

2024-12-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2024.12.20.24318345 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionHigh-density congregate housing, including cruise ships, hotels, residence halls and correctional facilities are epidemiologically important, and key aspects of pathogen transmission have been elucidated in these environments. A range of methods have been developed to detect unusual clusters of infections in these settings; however use of explicitly 3-D (x,y,z) spatial data has received little attention. In this study, we use data collected during the COVID-19 pandemic to assess the fine-scale spatial epidemiology and the clustering of confirmed cases to better understand impacts of spatial resolution and aggregation on spatio-temporal cluster detection. MethodsData for this analysis combined the results from mandatory weekly viral testing during the 2020-2021 academic year with high-resolution spatial data from university students residing in high-rise residence halls at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst campus. These data were analyzed for statistically-significant clustering of SARS-CoV-2 cases in three-dimensional space as well as time, within and between the high-density buildings on campus. Two sets of analyses were conducted. The first used a Space-Time Permutation Model, which scans for areas with a greater than expected number of cases (SaTScan). To assess the impact of data aggregation, analysis was done at several levels of spatial resolution. Additionally, we performed sensitivity analyses using a purely temporal surveillance algorithm, CDCs Early Aberration Reporting System-EARS. Results and conclusionsAnalysis with SaTScan at the room- and floor-level identified multiple statistically significant clusters within one residence hall. Analyses with these same cases aggregated at the floor-level were found to be as sensitive, but far less computationally intensive, than room-level analysis. Analysis at both of these spatial scales was more sensitive than analysis aggregated at the street address-level. Two events exceeding alert thresholds were detected in the purely temporal analysis; one of which was also detected in spatio-temporal analyses. These results expand our understanding of spatio-temporal scan metrics to include 3-D analysis, and optimizing choice of spatial scales. These results have broad applicability in epidemiology in assessing the ability of spatio-temporal methods for public health surveillance, with potential expansion to ecological studies incorporating vertical movement.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.6%
3
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
5
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
8
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
15
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
30
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%