Image Processing in the Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) Project
Sadil, P.; Arfanakis, K.; Bhuiyan, E. H.; Caffo, B.; Calhoun, V. D.; Clauw, D. J.; DeLano, M. C.; Ford, J. C.; Gattu, R.; Guo, X.; Harris, R. E.; Ichesco, E.; Johnson, M. A.; Jung, H.; Kahn, A. B.; Kaplan, C. M.; Leloudas, N.; Lindquist, M. A.; Luo, Q.; Mulderink, T. A.; Peltier, S. J.; Prasad, P. V.; Sica, C.; Urrutia, J.; Vance, C. G.; Wager, T. D.; Xuan, Y.; Zhou, X. J.; Zhou, Y.; Shu, D. C.; The Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures Consortium,
Show abstract
The Acute to Chronic Pain Signatures (A2CPS) project is a large-scale, multi-site initiative aimed at identifying biomarkers and biosignatures that predict the transition from acute to chronic pain. The project is collecting multimodal, longitudinal data from over 2,500 individuals at risk for developing chronic pain after surgery. Here we describe the neuroimaging component of A2CPS, including the acquisition protocols, processing pipelines, and contents of the initial data release. The imaging protocol includes structural, diffusion, resting-state and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Data are collected across multiple clinical sites using different scanner manufacturers, with attention to protocol harmonization and quality control. The processing pipeline integrates several established neuroimaging tools to extract potential biomarkers, including measures of brain structure, connectivity, and pain-related neural signatures. The first data release includes pre-surgical imaging data for 595 participants, with high quality ratings across modalities (98.7% of sMRI, 99.8% of dMRI, and 94.6% of fMRI images were rated as acceptable or better). Initial analyses demonstrate expected relationships between brain-derived measures and clinical variables, such as associations between brain age and psychological factors. This dataset represents a valuable resource for both pain research and neuroimaging methods development, with future releases planned to include additional participants and expanded analysis pipelines and processed data derivatives.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A 'Naturalistic Neuroimaging Database' for understanding the brain using ecological stimuli 97%
- The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control dataset, a theoretically-guided within-subject task fMRI battery 97%
- The Amsterdam Open MRI Collection, a set ofmultimodal MRI datasets for individual differenceanalyses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- An open, fully-processed data resource for studying mood and sleep variability in the developing brain 96%
- Longitudinal deformation based morphometry pipeline to study neuroanatomical differences in structural MRI based on SyN unbiased templates 95%
- VesselBoost: A Python Toolbox for Small Blood Vessel Segmentation in Human Magnetic Resonance Angiography Data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quality assessment and control of unprocessed anatomical, functional, and diffusion MRI of the human brain using MRIQC 94%
- A Checklist for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Concurrent tES-fMRI Studies (ContES Checklist): A Consensus Study and Statement 91%
- Genome-wide analysis of the dynamic and biophysical properties of chromatin and nuclear proteins in living cells with Hi-D 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connectomes for 40,000 UK Biobank participants: A multi-modal, multi-scale brain network resource 97%
- Automated joint skull-stripping and segmentation with Multi-Task U-Net in large mouse brain MRI databases 95%
- Tensor Image Registration Library: Automated Deformable Registration of Stand-Alone Histology Images to Whole-Brain Post-Mortem MRI Data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- THINGS-data: A multimodal collection of large-scale datasets for investigating object representations in human brain and behavior 94%
- Automated hippocampal unfolding for morphometry and subfield segmentation with HippUnfold 93%
- A generalizable brain extraction net (BEN) for multimodal MRI data from rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.