Back

Transfusion Probability as a Novel Measure for Lab-Guided Medical Decision-Making

Risk, M.; Callum, J.; Trentino, K.; Murray, K.; Zhao, L.; Shi, X.; Verma, A.; Razak, F.; Raza, S.

2024-12-20 hematology
10.1101/2024.12.19.24319329 medRxiv
Show abstract

The clinical decision to transfuse is strongly influenced by laboratory results. Analysis of transfusion decision-making based on pre-transfusion laboratory results (e.g. pre-transfusion hemoglobin) is a common yet misleading approach to study lab-guided transfusion practice. We introduce "Transfusion Probability" as a novel method which overcomes many limitations of pre-transfusion lab result analyses. Under this approach, we estimate the probability of transfusion after results at a specific value (e.g. hemoglobin 7.4 g/dL) or in a range of values (e.g. 7.0-7.9 g/dL) using the proportion of tests followed by transfusion. We provide statistical methodology for causal inference on the effect of patient conditions and apply our method to a large multi-center dataset. Analyses using pre-transfusion and transfusion probability were compared using data from a large longitudinal cohort of hospitalized patients (N=525,032 patients). We found red blood cell transfusion probabilities of 76.2% in the 6.0-6.9 g/dL, 18.9% in the 7.0-7.9 g/dL, and 4.5% in the 8.0-8.9 g/dL hemoglobin range. After confounder adjustment, patients with gastrointestinal bleeding patients were more likely to be transfused across all ranges, with risk differences ranging from 6.6% in the 8.0-8.9 g/dL range to 13.8% in the 6.0-6.9 g/dL range. Pre-transfusion hemoglobin results showed minimal differences between gastrointestinal bleeding patients and other patients in unadjusted (0.00 g/dL) and adjusted analyses (-0.20 g/dL). In contrast to pre-transfusion result analysis, transfusion probability offers a nuanced account of transfusion practice and allows for natural comparisons between patient groups. Wider adoption of transfusion probability analysis may provide direct and actionable insights for clinical decision-making. KEY POINTS O_LIPre-transfusion lab results are a widely used method for studying lab-guided transfusion but subject to many limitations C_LIO_LITransfusion probability analysis is a novel and superior approach C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.