Back

A simple silicone elastomer colonisation model highlights complexities of Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus interactions in biofilm formation.

McConnell, G.; Rooney, L. M.; Sandison, M. E.; Hoskisson, P. A.; Baxter, K. J.

2025-01-02 microbiology
10.1101/2024.12.18.629256 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) significantly contribute to the burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A major factor in HAIs is the colonisation of indwelling medical devices by biofilm-forming opportunistic pathogens such as Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus. These organisms frequently co-infect, resulting in synergistic interactions with enhanced virulence and resistance to treatment. C. albicans and S. aureus readily form dual-species biofilms on silicone elastomers, a commonly used medical device material, yet the colonisation phenotypes of these organisms on such surfaces remains poorly understood. We developed a simple, optically tractable model to mimic the colonisation of indwelling medical devices to investigate C. albicans and S. aureus biofilm formation. The system utilises discs of a silicone elastomer embedded in agar, reflecting device-associated conditions and enabling high-resolution imaging of biofilms formed by C. albicans and S. aureus co-culture. Initial results using the silicone elastomer colonisation model reveal robust biofilm formation. These biofilms exhibited morphological differences between dual species biofilms formed by S. aureus co-cultures with either yeast- or hyphal-form C. albicans, indicating the impact of differing C. albicans cell morphotypes in biofilm-associated medical device colonization on silicone elastomers. Quantification of biofilm formation by crystal violet staining provided further validation of the system. These findings underscore the importance of developing tools for biofilm study which more closely resemble the infectious microenvironment, with our work detailing such a system which can be employed in further study to improve strategies against device-related HAIs.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
7
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
12
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
16
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
20
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
22
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
ACS Infectious Diseases
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%