Back

Not all cross-modal responses are explained by face movements

Olsen, T. R.; Hasenstaub, A. R.

2024-12-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.12.18.629217 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The meaning and functions of cross-modal sensory processing in the cortex is at the center of an ongoing debate. While some studies claim that such responses reflect genuine multisensory integration, others argue they are mere artifacts of stimulus-evoked movement or changes in internal state. We examined this issue by measuring face movements and neural activity in awake mouse primary auditory cortex (A1) and primary visual cortex (V1) during visual and auditory stimulation. Visual stimuli rarely evoked face movements, A1 responses to visual input remained robust even in the absence of movement, and optogenetic silencing of V1 reduced A1 visual responses, confirming a sensory origin of these cross-modal responses. These findings directly challenge the argument that cross- modal responses are purely movement-driven and emphasize that rather than assuming all cross-modal effects are artifactual, researchers must rigorously test each case. HighlightsO_LIUnlike auditory stimuli, visual stimuli rarely evoke face movements C_LIO_LIFace movements explain sound-evoked firing in VC but not visually evoked firing in AC C_LIO_LISilencing VC suppresses visually evoked firing in AC C_LIO_LIThese results confirm a sensory (rather than motor) origin of these responses C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.