Measurement of perceived healthcare discrimination and its implications on population health research: A systematic review protocol
Green, M. D.; Harlow, A. B.; Janek, S. E.; Weinfert, K. P.; Skalla, L.; O'Brien, E. C.; Brookhart, M. A.; Navar, A. M.; Muhigaba, P.; Bentley-Edwards, K. L.; Dupre, M. E.; Thorpe, R. J.
Show abstract
PurposeDiscrimination in healthcare settings significantly impacts population health, affecting individuals of racial and ethnic minoritized identities, sexual and gender minoritized identities, and individuals with disabilities. Most measures of discrimination are derived from instruments assessing everyday discrimination experiences and do not adequately capture the specific nuances of healthcare-related discrimination. This systematic review protocol outlines a planned study that will evaluate and synthesize tools designed to measure discrimination in healthcare settings in the United States (U.S.). By providing a detailed overview of these measurement tools and their psychometric properties, this review will enhance understanding of healthcare discrimination and guide policy and practice towards improving health equity. MethodsA comprehensive search will be conducted across four databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) and supplemented by citation tracking of reviewed articles. The review will focus on studies involving measurements of perceived discrimination within healthcare settings in the United States. The primary outcomes include the reliability, validity, and specificity of discrimination measurement instruments. Quality assessment will use the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) Risk of Bias tool. Our systematic review will be present findings based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of Health Measurment INstruments of outcome measurements 2024 (PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024) reporting standard. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42024592267. DiscussionThis review will synthesize existing literature and offer a comprehensive evaluation of discrimination measurement tools to guide future health equity research. This review aims to contribute to the mitigation of healthcare inequities and the promotion of health equity by offering actionable insights into the measurement of discrimination in healthcare settings.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 95%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 95%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 94%
- Maternity care professionals’ preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis 94%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 94%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Healthcare workers experiences of working on the frontline and views about support during COVID-19 and comparable pandemics: A rapid review and meta-synthesis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 93%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 92%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 92%
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.