Back

Loss of olfaction reduces caterpillar performance and increases susceptibility to a natural enemy

Wang, Q.; Jia, Y.; Smid, H.; Weldegergis, B.; Greenberg, L.; Jongsma, M.; Dicke, M.; Haverkamp, A.

2024-12-20 ecology
10.1101/2024.12.17.629055 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Insect herbivores such as caterpillars, are under strong selection pressure from natural enemies, especially parasitoid wasps. Although the role of olfaction in host-plant seeking has been investigated in great detail in parasitoids and adult lepidopterans, the caterpillar olfactory system and its significance in tri-trophic interactions remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the olfactory system of Pieris brassicae caterpillars and the importance of olfactory information in the interactions among this herbivore, its host plant Brassica oleracea and its primary natural enemy Cotesia glomerata. To examine the role of olfaction, we utilized CRISPR/Cas9 to knockout the odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco). This knockout (KO) impaired olfactory detection and primary processing in the brain. Orco KO caterpillars exhibited reduced weight and lost preference for their optimal food plants. Interestingly, the KO caterpillars also experienced reduced weight when challenged by the parasitoid C. glomerata whose ovipositor had been removed, and the mortality of the KO caterpillars under the attack of unmanipulated parasitoids increased. We then investigated the behavior of P. brassicae caterpillars in response to volatiles from plants attacked by conspecific caterpillars and volatiles from plants on which the caterpillars were themselves attacked by C. glomerata. After analyzing the volatile compounds involved in these interactions, we concluded that olfactory information enables caterpillars to locate suitable food sources more efficiently as well as to select enemy-free spaces. Our results reveal the crucial role of olfaction in caterpillar feeding and natural-enemy avoidance, highlighting the significance of chemoreceptor genes in shaping ecological interactions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 8%
11.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.2%
4
Insects
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
6
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Journal of Economic Entomology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
20
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
23
Integrative and Comparative Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%