Back

The transcriptomic signature of age and sex is not conserved in human primary myocytes

Lamon, S.; Soria, M.; Williams, R. M.; Critchlow, A.; Garnham, A.; Varshney, A.; Beilharz, T.; Hiam, D.; Ziemann, M.

2024-12-18 cell biology
10.1101/2024.12.17.629041 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHuman primary muscle cell (HPMC) lines derived from skeletal muscle biopsies are potentially powerful tools to interrogate the molecular pathways underlying fundamental muscle mechanisms. HPMCs retain their genome in culture, but many endogenous circulating factors are not present in the in vitro environment, or at concentrations that do not mirror physiological levels. To address the assumption that HPMCs are valid models of age and sex-specificity in human muscle research, we examined to what extent HPMC lines retain their source phenotype in culture. MethodsBiopsies from the vastus lateralis muscle were collected from ten males aged 18-30, ten females aged 18-30 and ten males aged 60-75 recruited from a general, healthy population. A portion of the muscle was used for the establishment of 30 individual HMPC lines. The remaining sample was immediately snap frozen and stored for further analysis. RNA was extracted from muscle tissue samples and their corresponding, fully differentiated HMPCs and analysed using RNA Sequencing. To compare their transcriptomic signature, principal component analysis (PCA), differential expression analysis, single-cell deconvolution and pathway enrichment analysis were conducted in R. ResultsA comparison of the transcriptomic signature of 30 human muscle biopsies and their corresponding HPMCs indicated a near-complete lack of retention of the genes and pathways differentially regulated in vivo when compared to their in vitro equivalent, with the exception of several genes encoded on the Y-chromosome. ConclusionsThe diversity of resident cell populations in muscle tissue and the lack of sex- and age-dependent circulating factors in the cellular milieu likely contribute to these observations, which call for caution when using HPMCs as an experimental model of human muscle sex or age.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
10
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
16
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Experimental Cell Research
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Mitochondrion
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
29
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%