Back

CD38 biallelic loss is a recurrent mechanism of resistance to anti-CD38 antibodies in multiple myeloma.

Diamond, B.; Baughn, L.; Poorebrahim, M.; Poos, A. M.; Lee, H.; Kaddoura, M.; Wiedmeier-Nutor, E.; Durante, M.; Otteson, G.; Jevremovic, D.; Tang, H.; Frohling, S.; Baertsch, M. A.; Papadimitriou, M.; Ziccheddu, B.; Jelinek, T.; Lemoine, C.; Rak, A.; Green, D. J.; Landgren, O.; Neri, P.; Bergsagel, L.; Braggio, E.; Kumar, S.; Raab, M. S.; Fonseca, R.; Bahlis, N.; Weinhold, N.; MAURA, F.

2024-12-20 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.12.17.628799 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 are a therapeutic mainstay in multiple myeloma (MM). While they have contributed to improved outcomes, most patients still experience disease relapse, and little is known about tumor-intrinsic mechanisms of resistance to these drugs. Antigen escape has been implicated as a mechanism of tumor cell evasion in immunotherapy. Yet, it is unknown whether MM cells can develop permanent resistance to anti-CD38 antibodies by acquiring genomic events leading to biallelic disruption of the CD38 gene locus. Here, by using whole genome and whole exome sequencing data from 701 newly diagnosed patients, 67 patients at relapse with naivety to anti-CD38 antibodies, and 50 patients collected at relapse following anti-CD38 antibodies. We report a loss of CD38 in 20% (10/50) of patients post-CD38 therapy, three of which exhibited a loss of both copies. Two of these cases showed convergent evolution where distinct subclones independently acquired similar advantageous variants. Functional studies on missense mutations involved in biallelic CD38 events revealed that two variants, L153H and C275Y, decreased binding affinity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of the commercial antibodies Daratumumab and Isatuximab. However, a third mutation, R140G, conferred selective resistance to Daratumumab, while retaining sensitivity to Isatuximab. Clinically, patients with MM are often rechallenged with CD38 antibodies following disease progression and these data support a role for next generation sequencing to guide treatment selection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Blood Cancer Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.6%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.1%
5
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
7
Haematologica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
8
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
10
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
12
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
13
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Modern Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 71%
1.0%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
19
HemaSphere
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
24
Journal of Experimental Medicine
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
30
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%