Deep learning-based stride segmentation with wearable sensors: effects of data quantity, sensor location, and task
Anderson, A. J.; Gonzalez, M.; Eguren, D.; Khan, N.; Zuccaroli, I.; Hirczy, S.; Kelly, V.; Muir, B.; Kontson, K. L.
Show abstract
Accurate stride segmentation from wearable sensors is foundational for digital gait assessment tools, yet systematic evaluations of deep learning approaches across varied real-world mobility tasks remain limited. We developed and assessed Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) models for stride segmentation using data from 121 older adults with and without Parkinsons disease, specifically evaluating how performance varies with model development data quantity, sensor location, and movement complexity. Using a fixed-size test set of 40 participants, we found that lower limb sensors achieved F1 scores above 95% during walking with just 5-10 training participants, but performance declined substantially during more complex movements such as 180{degrees} turns. Foot-mounted sensors maintained robust performance across tasks (F1: 99.3% walking, 96.7% turning, 88.4% stationary and transitional movements), while wrist sensors showed marked degradation (F1: 88.4% walking, 72.3% turning, 50.0% stationary and transitional movements). Our findings demonstrate that it is important to tailor performance testing for digital gait assessment tools to both sensor location and use case, as performance achieved during controlled walking may not generalize to complex movements in daily life.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An explainable spatial-temporal graphical convolutional network to score freezing of gait in parkinsonian patients 95%
- Development of a Tremor Detection Algorithm for use in an Academic Movement Disorders Center 93%
- Validity and sensitivity of an inertial measurement unit-driven biomechanical model of motor variability for gait 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gait signature changes with walking speed are similar among able-bodied young adults despite persistent individual-specific differences 94%
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 94%
- Discrimination of finger movements by magnetomyography with optically pumped magnetometers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying Device Type and Handedness Biases in a Remote Parkinson’s Disease AI-Powered Assessment 95%
- Crowdsourcing digital health measures to predict Parkinson's disease severity: the Parkinson's Disease Digital Biomarker DREAM Challenge 95%
- A Machine-Learning Based Objective Measure for ALS Disease Severity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of FootNet; a new kinematic algorithm to improve foot-strike and toe-off detection in treadmill running 94%
- A Low-Cost Markerless motion capture system to automate Functional Gait Assessment: Feasibility Study 94%
- Uncovering locomotor learning dynamics in people with Parkinson's disease 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.