Back

Deciphering T-wave Morphologies on ECGs: The Simplified Egg and Changing Yolk Model and the Importance of the QTp Interval

Stone, K.; Mistry, A.; Cyrus, D.; Cannon, J.; Mokrzecki, I.; Rezwan, F. I.

2025-01-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.12.17.24318926 medRxiv
Show abstract

The Electrocardiogram (ECG) serves as an integral tool in the diagnosis and management of a variety of cardiac diseases. It visualises electrical activity in the heart, offering insights into several cardiac processes, including ventricular repolarisation. The morphology of the T-wave observed on ECGs during this repolarisation phase varies and can be peaked, flat, inverted, or biphasic, each representing different cardiac conditions. Despite their prevalence, the interpretation of these patterns remains challenging. Therefore, we proposed the Simplified Egg and Changing Yolk Model, a novel idea to aid in the understanding of these T-wave morphologies in ECGs. The proposed Simplified Egg and Changing Yolk Model was developed through an analysis of various T-wave morphologies and their corresponding clinical implications. The model was further designed to conceptualise the ST interval and the T-wave as a single unit, contributing to a simplified yet comprehensive understanding of ventricular repolarisation. In this context, the Q-wave start to T-wave peak interval(QTp) was compared to the more commonly used corrected QT-interval (QTc) for assessing the risk of arrhythmia and the effects of medication that prolong the QT-interval. The Simplified Egg and Changing Yolk Model could effectively explain and interpret the variation of ECG patterns associated with ventricular repolarisation. It provided insight into the relevance of deflections seen during this phase. Importantly, the model identified QTp as a more reliable measure than QTc for assessing arrhythmia risk and evaluating medication impacts on the QT-interval. Our model offers a significant enhancement to the understanding of ventricular repolarisation and its manifestation on ECGs. By emphasising the superiority of QTp over QTc in clinical assessment, this model can have significant impact in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
5
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
12
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
21
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
22
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%