Human-computer interactions and compassionate healthcare: A Wizard of Oz study using a self-administered AI-assisted cognitive assessment
Teng, M.; Yu, M.; Jin, W.; Hwang, D. W.; Stitt, D.; Conati, C.; Carenini, G.; Jarus, T.; Field, T. S.
Show abstract
IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming healthcare, however, the interaction between the user, AI, and the users environment is poorly understood. To elucidate this interplay and support the delivery of compassionate remote care in Occupational Therapy (OT) practice, we created a self-administered remote AI-powered cognitive assessment, facilitated using the Wizard of Oz method, and measured the experiences of patients, controls, caregivers, and healthcare providers. The Wizard of Oz method uses human-computer interaction (HCI) and user experience (UX) research to simulate the functionality of a system before it is fully developed by creating the illusion of a functioning system by having a human behind the scenes, controlling the systems responses. Research Questions: 1. How are AI-assisted cognitive assessments experienced by patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, and controls? 2. How can we maintain compassionate care while incorporating technology into healthcare? 3. What are the concerns of healthcare providers using chatbots to administer cognitive assessments? Methods6 participants with progressive cognitive decline, 6 healthy controls, 6 caregivers, and 6 healthcare providers were invited to complete a virtual AI-powered cognitive assessment followed by a survey about their experience and other demographical information. Survey questions were separated into 4 scales: Trust, Compassion, Usability, and Care Experience. ResultsNo statistically significant difference in mean survey scores between participant categories was observed. Factors such as sex, device type, chatbot familiarity, and education had no statistically significant effects. Participants scored statistically significantly lower on the scale Trust (8.09) than on Compassion (8.72). Additionally, those who used the chatbot during the assessment scored statistically significantly lower on the Usability scale compared to those who did not (7.33 vs. 9.20). ConclusionThe findings help to evaluate user experience with virtual AI-based cognitive assessments and provide insights that can inform important design characteristics to improve user experience and compassionate care delivery. Author SummaryAs more technological advancements are being achieved in our modern lives today, we continue to see an increasing amount of these technologies in our healthcare system as well. AI is a popular category of these technological advancements and appropriately implementing this powerful tool into day-to-day medicine may prove to benefit our healthcare system. However, we first need to understand our current views on how AI can affect our delivery of care. In this paper, we explored user experience specifically in the context of a cognitive screening tool using wizard of Oz methodology. In brief, our research explores how various stakeholders (patients, control, caregivers, healthcare providers) experience and feel about using a virtual AI-assisted platform for conducting cognitive assessments. We believe that further exploration of AI in medicine and how it can be improved provides an overview of our attitudes towards implementing artificial intelligence into our healthcare system and will also inspire further research for artificial intelligence in medicine.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 94%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
- Development of the AD F ICE_IT clinical decision support system to assist deprescribing of fall-risk increasing drugs: A user-centered design approach 95%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental Chronometry in the Pocket? Timing Accuracy of Web Applications on Touchscreen and Keyboard Devices 94%
- Measuring motion-to-photon latency for sensorimotor experiments with virtual reality systems 91%
- Beyond Traditional Assessments of Cognitive Impairment: Exploring the Potential of Spatial Navigation Tasks 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 96%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 96%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 95%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 95%
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.