Distinct representational properties of cues and contexts shape fear learning and extinction
Bouyeure, A.; Pacheco, D.; Fellner, M.-C.; Jacob, G.; Kobelt, M.; Rose, J.; Axmacher, N.
Show abstract
When we learn that something is dangerous, a fear memory is formed. However, this memory is not fixed and can be updated through new experiences, such as learning that the threat is no longer present. This process of updating, known as extinction or reversal learning, is highly dependent on the context in which it occurs. How the brain represents cues, contexts, and their changing threat value remains a major question. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging and a novel fear learning paradigm to track the neural representations of stimuli across fear acquisition, reversal, and test phases. We found that initial fear learning creates generalized neural representations for all threatening cues in the brains fear network. During reversal learning, when threat contingencies switched for some of the cues, two distinct representational strategies were observed. On the one hand, we still identified generalized patterns for currently threatening cues, whereas on the other hand, we observed highly stable representations of individual cues (i.e., item-specific) that changed their valence, particularly in the precuneus and prefrontal cortex. Furthermore, we observed that the brain represents contexts more distinctly during reversal learning. Furthermore, additional exploratory analyses showed that the degree of this context specificity in the prefrontal cortex predicted the subsequent return of fear, providing a potential neural mechanism for fear renewal. Our findings reveal that the brain uses a flexible combination of generalized and specific representations to adapt to a changing world, shedding new light on the mechanisms that support cognitive flexibility and the treatment of anxiety disorders via exposure therapy.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Unravelling the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying counterconditioning in humans 96%
- Robust group- but limited individual-level (longitudinal) reliability and insights into cross-phases response prediction of conditioned fear 96%
- Phase separation of competing memories along the human hippocampal theta rhythm. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time-dependent neural arbitration between cue associative and episodic fear memories 98%
- Decisions bias future choices by modifying hippocampal associative memories 98%
- Tuned to Learn: An anticipatory hippocampal convergence state conducive to memory formation revealed during midbrain activation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction errors for aversive events shape long-term memory formation through a distinct neural mechanism 98%
- Subcortical nuclei of the human ascending arousal system encode anticipated reward but do not predict subsequent memory 96%
- Strategic control of location and ordinal context in visual working memory 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.