Back

Spatial Phylogenetics with Continuous Data: an Application to California Bryophytes

Kling, M. M.; Gonzalez-Ramirez, I. S.; Carter, B.; Borokini, I.; Mishler, B. D.

2024-12-20 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.12.16.628580 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial phylogenetics is premised on the idea that species are not discrete categorical entities but instead lie on a hierarchical evolutionary continuum that contains rich biological information valuable for quantifying spatial biodiversity patterns. Yet while spatial phylogenetic approaches use quantitative information to represent phylogenetic patterns, most have continued to rely on methods that discard valuable information about spatial patterns by converting continuous variables into binary categories. This includes representing geographic ranges using binary presence-absence data, classifying statistical significance into categories, and quantifying biogeographic gradients into discrete regions. In this paper we show how a full suite of spatial phylogenetic analyses, including analyses of alpha and beta diversity, neo- and paleo-endemism, biogeographic hypothesis testing, and spatial conservation prioritization, can be implemented with "smooth" methods that never remove information content by categorizing continuous data. Our analysis focuses on the bryophytes of California, an understudied group in a global plant biodiversity hotspot. Using a time-calibrated phylogeny and species distribution models for 548 species of mosses and liverworts, we profile the evolutionary diversity, compositional turnover, and conservation value of bryophyte communities across the state. Our results highlight important patterns in the diversity of this key plant group, while our methods can serve as a model for future studies seeking to maximize the information content of spatial phylogenetic analyses.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.2%
2
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
4
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
5
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
7
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
9
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
10
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
12
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
25
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%