Back

5G Radio-Frequency-Electromagnetic-Field Effects on the Human Sleep Electroencephalogram: A Randomized Controlled Study in CACNA1C Genotyped Healthy Volunteers

Sousouri, G.; Eicher, C.; D'Angelo, R. M.; Billecocq, M.; Fussinger, T.; Studler, M.; Capstick, M.; Kuster, N.; Achermann, P.; Huber, R.; Landolt, H.-P.

2024-12-26 public and global health
10.1101/2024.12.16.24319082 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe introduction of 5G technology as the latest standard in mobile telecommunications has raised concerns about its potential health effects. Prior studies of earlier generations of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) demonstrated narrowband spectral increases in the electroencephalographic (EEG) spindle frequency range (11-16 Hz) in non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep. However, the impact of 5G RF-EMF on sleep remains unexplored. Additionally, RF-EMF can activate L-type voltage-gated calcium channels (LTCC), which have been linked to sleep quality and EEG oscillatory activity. ObjectiveThis study investigates whether the allelic variant rs7304986 in the CACNA1C gene, encoding the 1C subunit of LTCC, modulates 5G RF-EMF effects on EEG spindle activity during NREM sleep. MethodsThirty-four healthy, matched participants, genotyped for rs7304986 (15 T/C and 19 T/T carriers), underwent a double-blind, sham-controlled study with standardized left-hemisphere exposure to two 5G RF-EMF signals (3.6 GHz and 700 MHz) for 30 min before sleep. Sleep spindle activity was analyzed using high-density EEG and the Fitting Oscillations & One Over f (FOOOF) algorithm. ResultsT/C carriers reported longer sleep latency compared to T/T carriers. A significant interaction between RF-EMF exposure and rs7304986 genotype was observed, with 3.6 GHz exposure in T/C carriers inducing a faster spindle center frequency in the central, parietal, and occipital cortex compared to sham. ConclusionThese findings suggest 3.6 GHz 5G RF-EMF modulates spindle center frequency during NREM sleep in a CACNA1C genotype-dependent manner, implicating LTCC in the physiological response to RF-EMF and underscoring the need for further research into 5G effects on brain health.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.9%
3
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Sleep Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
Journal of Sleep Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.6%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.5%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.3%
10
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
17
Epilepsia Open
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Journal of Psychopharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
23
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
24
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.9%
26
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%