Non-ionotropic signaling through the NMDA receptor GluN2B carboxy terminal domain drives morphological plasticity of dendritic spines and reverses fragile X phenotypes in mouse hippocampus
Barnes, S. A.; Thomazeau, A.; Finnie, P. S. B.; Heinrich, M. J.; Heynen, A. J.; Komiyama, N.; Grant, S. G. N.; Menniti, F. S.; Osterweil, E. K.; Bear, M. F.
Show abstract
It is well known that activation of NMDA receptors can trigger long-term synaptic depression (LTD) and that a morphological correlate of this functional plasticity is spine retraction and elimination. Recent studies have led to the surprising conclusion that NMDA-induced spine shrinkage proceeds independently of ion flux and requires the initiation of de novo protein synthesis, highlighting an unappreciated contribution of mRNA translation to non-ionotropic NMDAR signaling. Here we used NMDA-induced spine shrinkage in slices of mouse hippocampus as a readout to investigate this novel modality of synaptic transmission. By using selective pharmacological and genetic tools, we find that structural plasticity is dependent on the ligand binding domain (LBD) of GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors and that metabotropic signaling occurs via the GluN2B carboxyterminal domain (CTD). Disruption of signaling by replacing the GluN2B CTD with the GluN2A CTD leads to increased spine density, dysregulated basal protein synthesis, and epileptiform activity in area CA3 reminiscent of phenotypes observed in the Fmr1-/y model of fragile X syndrome. By crossing the Fmr1-/y mice with animals in which the GluN2A CTD has been replaced with the GluN2B CTD, we observe a correction of these core fragile X phenotypes. These findings suggest that non-ionotropic NMDAR signaling through GluN2B may represent a novel therapeutic target for treatment of fragile X and related causes of intellectual disability and autism.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ketogenic diet dampens excitatory neurotransmission by shrinking synaptic vesicle pools 97%
- Ca2+-dependent phosphodiesterase 1 regulates the plasticity of striatal spiny projection neuron glutamatergic synapses 96%
- The ventral CA2 region of the hippocampus and its differential contributions to social memory and social aggression 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Delta glutamate receptor conductance drives excitation of dorsal raphe neurons 95%
- Astrocyte GluN2C NMDA receptors control basal synaptic strengths of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in the stratum radiatum 95%
- Heterozygosity for neurodevelopmental disorder-associated TRIO variants yields distinct deficits in behavior, neuronal development, and synaptic transmission in mice. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A pathogenic missense mutation in kainate receptors elevates dendritic excitability and synaptic integration through dysregulation of SK channels 97%
- Altered A-type potassium channel function impairs dendritic spike initiation and temporammonic long-term potentiation in Fragile X syndrome 96%
- Inhibitory neurons marked by the connectivity molecule Kirrel3 regulate memory precision 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Abnormal AMPAR-mediated synaptic plasticity, cognitive and autistic-like behaviors in a missense Fmr1 mutant mouse model of Fragile X syndrome 97%
- Endoplasmic reticulum visits highly active spines and prevents runaway potentiation of synapses 96%
- PKA drives an increase in AMPA receptor unitary conductance during LTP in the hippocampus 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Activating mGlu3 metabotropic glutamate receptors rescues schizophrenia-like cognitive deficits through metaplastic adaptations within the hippocampus. 96%
- Reduced Kv3.1 Activity in Dentate Gyrus Parvalbumin Cells Induces Vulnerability to Depression. 96%
- Molecularly-Defined Hippocampal Inputs Regulate Population Dynamics in the Prelimbic Cortex to Suppress Context Fear Memory Recall 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.