Back

Aging disrupts spatiotemporal coordination in the cycling ovary

Lan, T. C. T.; Fischer, D. S.; Kochersberger, A.; Raichur, R.; Szady, S.; Simeonova, R.; Minagar, A.; Tran, H.; Shalek, A. K.; Sabeti, P.; Kumar, V.; Marrero, G.; Barrera, I.; Mangiameli, S.; Chen, F.; Garrison, J. L.; Chung, H.

2024-12-17 genomics
10.1101/2024.12.15.628550 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Throughout the female reproductive lifespan, the ovary completes hundreds of cycles of follicle development, ovulation, and tissue regeneration1-3. These processes rely on the precisely coordinated intricate multicellular interactions across time and space4. How aging disrupts these interactions, leading to an overall decline in reproductive and endocrine functions, remains understudied. To understand the multicellular dynamics that underlie ovarian function and their changes with age, here we use Slide-seq, a near-cellular spatial transcriptomics method, to profile 22 mouse ovaries across the reproductive cycle and chronological age, representing 610,620 near-cellular spots across 69 spatial transcriptomic profiles5,6. We develop a segmentation analysis to identify spatial niches that capture different states of folliculogenesis from static snapshots in situ, allowing us to examine the multicellular dynamics of 358 oocytes, 668 follicles, and 236 corpora lutea. We find that aging disrupts both the spatial organization and temporal coordination of folliculogenesis before the cessation of cycling, which may contribute to the dysregulation of hormone production and signaling. These disruptions are marked by altered immune cell dynamics, inflammatory signaling, and global tissue disorganization that impair the cyclic remodeling required for ovarian function. Our findings reveal how multicellular niches orchestrate ovarian function and demonstrate how age-related breakdown of tissue organization across time and space precedes reproductive decline.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.