Longitudinal Measurement Properties of the Participation Questionnaire for Preschoolers: Reliability, Responsiveness, and Interpretability
Nakamura, T.; Koshio, I.; Maruyama, S.; Ikeda, K.; Nagayama, H.; Sasada, S.
Show abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Preschool Questionnaire for Participation (PQP), a tool for assessing participation in preschool children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). MethodsA cohort study was conducted with data collected at four time points over six months from children with ASD aged 51-75 months. Test-retest reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for 275 participants who completed the study. Responsiveness was examined by analyzing correlations between changes in PQP scores and changes in multiple scales based on four predefined hypotheses. To assess interpretability, the Global Rating of Change (GRC) Scale was used as an anchor to analyze receiver operating characteristic curves and estimate the minimal important change (MIC). ResultsICCs ranged from 0.80 to 0.92 for individual factors and reached 0.93 for the total score. Three of the four hypotheses for responsiveness were supported within the expected range. However, the correlation between the GRC Scale and changes in PQP scores was below 0.3, preventing MIC calculation. ConclusionWhile the MIC could not be calculated, the PQP demonstrated test-retest reliability equivalent to or better than existing participation measures. Given the limited verification of responsiveness for other tools, the PQPs strong longitudinal reliability and validity provide a foundation for future research.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) to screen for atypical social behaviors in juvenile macaques 94%
- Characteristics of University Students Supported by Counseling Services: Analysis of psychological tests and pulse rate variability 93%
- Identifying Neuroanatomical and Behavioral Features for Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis in Children using Machine Learning 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence and developmental course of auditory processing differences in autistic children 94%
- Cognitive abilities and irritability are the main factors influencing initial placement of autistic preschoolers in special or mainstream education 93%
- Hand-foot coordination is significantly influenced by motion direction in individuals with autism spectrum disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combinatorial language parent-report score differs significantly between typically developing children and those with Autism Spectrum Disorders 95%
- The Brief Observation of Symptoms of Autism (BOSA): Development of a New Adapted Assessment Measure for Remote Telehealth Administration through COVID-19 and Beyond 95%
- Theory of Mind and Moral Decision-Making in the Context of Autism Spectrum Disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trajectories of imitation skills in preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorders 93%
- Validation of the Food Safe Zone Questionnaire for Families of Individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome 91%
- Prediction of autism spectrum disorder diagnosis using nonlinear measures of language-related EEG at 6 and 12 months 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiological and Psychological Effects of Parental Traditional Thai Massage on Children with Autism: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 88%
- Digitally Diagnosing Multiple Developmental Delays using Crowdsourcing fused with Machine Learning: A Research Protocol 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.